• Peaty
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have a study with a sample size of one that concludes that people shouldn’t drink milk tea because of the intense gas pain that follows. You should see my p value. It’s glorious.

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Interestingly enough, there is a design that still works with a single person… But it requires a bunch of time points. In other words, you can prove milk tea is bad for you in particular by drinking it enough times and having terrible gas and/or diarrhea to improve that p value.

        You naturally can’t extrapolate that to others in the population but at least you’ll definitively prove you probably have lactose intolorance!

    • taiyang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m so glad I didn’t see that. I hate just now easy it is for things to get published and, worse, draw media attention.

      Although if I had to guess, it isn’t the sample size and sds so much as drawing stupid conclusions from correlations without using controls for things that actually lead to depression and addiction. (Like the wine is good for you studies that ignore the benefits of wealth, ugh)

      • Peaty
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        The wine is good for you did not ignore the benefits of wealth.

        It first ignored the fact that the initial study was of Japanese doctors and maybe having a medical education made you more likely to adopt healthier practices.

        The next study ignored wealth.

        The next study ignored education and wealth.

        It proceeds to be bad study after bad study until 20 or so years after the first study when someone thought “what if the non-drinking crowd included people who were alcoholics and people who had to stop drinking because of health problems?” Turns out when you only focus on non-drinkers who never regularly drank and compared them with wine drinkers the wine drinking crowd has a lot more health issues.

        I work in the wine business and I laugh every time I see a new study to see what they ignored to conclude wine was a health food

        • taiyang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wine as a health food is such wishful thinking, haha. I have the privilege of learning some advanced statistical methods in grad school and so many of those issues are easily accounted for with better data and models.

          Or, you know, common sense. Lol

  • photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hey man, I had a time limit on my project so it wasn’t like I could’ve done all the experiments I wanted, okay? I did the best with what I had…

    I think I might’ve taken this a little too personally

  • Suspicious@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reading about medical research on trans people: “4 of the 16 patients studied…” Like why are we even doing rhis

    • jjagaimo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Usually case studies and smaller studies like that help to inform hypotheses and gather information about potential issues or confounding variables before running larger or full scale experiments. They’re also cheaper and can help with garnering interest and investment