• proleBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Looks like every claim in the article is supported with a valid source.

    • GorilladrumsBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      What I said isn’t new or controversial. Common Dreams is quite literally a propaganda website. They don’t cover things fairly, they intentionally only portray a single side of an issue, they have an agenda to push. This is literally all on their website. Common Dreams is in the same tier as the Daily Wire or The Blaze. Trying to pass any of these as legitimate news source is stupid, they’re not.

      • proleBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I wasn’t defending Common Dreams. Just pointing out, in this case, it seems that they’re backing their claims up with links to actual trustworthy sources.

        • GorilladrumsBanned
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          My point is that even if that is the case, you’re going to get a clearly slanted story because the entire organization is built with the intent of serving specific narratives and interests. There’s no such thing as unbiased news, but there is such a thing as overly biased.