Charles and Kathleen Moore are about to have their day in the Supreme Court over a $15,000 tax bill they contend is unconstitutional.

The couple from Redmond, Washington, claim they had to pay the money because of their investment in an Indian company from which, as Charles Moore, 62, said in a sworn statement, they “have never received a distribution, dividend, or other payment.”

But significant parts of the story they have told to reach this point seem at odds with public records.

The Moores are the public face of a high court case backed by business and conservative political interests that could call into question other parts of the U.S. tax code and rule out a much-discussed but never-enacted tax on wealth. The case is set for arguments on Dec. 5.

  • YeetPics@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Idk, they have these fascist pigs with retired military gear everywhere. Their enforcement system is already in place.

    • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      See the way you solve that is you arm yourself as well. We may not be able to beat them if it comes to that, but we can damn sure make them bleed for it.

        • Mouselemming
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          From what I’ve seen, the playing around with guns the rural Republicans do isn’t really training. Given time they’ll all shoot each other. Or themselves.

      • YeetPics@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I am armed just fine, but you’re nuts if you think anything we can buy legally in the states would leave much of a dent in military grade people movers and armored craft.

        I live in a small town of 50-60k people and the small village police department near me has an APC. The kind designed to be able to survive IEDs and small caliber rounds.

            • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re not wrong. You might even be optimistic.

              It’s not like they’d really care if the targeting algorithms occasionally decide all baby strollers are IEDs.

          • YeetPics@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Who thinks that?

            The fatshit driving the apc is probably wearing his own armor and likely has a higher caliber rifle than I do. Hopeless? No. Am I stupid enough to say I wouldn’t be afraid? Also no.

            • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Bro, most “military grade” body armor won’t protect you from a deer rifle, and the specific configurations of AR-15 owned by the government and called M16/M4/Whatever use glorified .223.

              • YeetPics@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That totally solves my issue of having 0 armor and small caliber hunting arms.

                I’m not a tacticool fool, and I’m also not delusional.

        • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Molotov cocktails are the key to all armored vehicles.

          If you burn all the oxygen in the air outside then there is none to breathe when it gets inside, plus metal box covered in Flames is pretty much just an oven