The GOP congresswoman has accused trans people and drag queens of “grooming” and “sexualiz[ing]” children

Rep. Lauren Boebert has been outspoken about her disapproval of drag queens, but that didn’t stop the Colorado congresswoman from spending hundreds of campaign dollars at a bar that hosts drag shows.

According to Politico, which cited her latest Federal Election Commission filings, Boebert’s campaign spent $317.48 in July for “event catering” at Hooch Craft Cocktail Bar in Aspen, Co., which is owned by Boebert’s former boyfriend, Quinn Gallagher. Boebert and Gallagher were booted from a performance of Beetlejuice last month for disruptive conduct, including vaping, loud singing and fondling each other at the family-friendly production. Boebert later said she and Gallagher, a Democrat, had broken up. “All future date nights have been canceled. I learned to check party affiliations before you go on a date,” Boebert told TMZ.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    16311 months ago

    I learned to check party affiliations before going on a date

    Yeah, that was definitely the Problem. Not the vaping, fondling, obnoxious behavior… Sure.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      7211 months ago

      Don’t forget the tits out for Harambe too. She exposed herself in the presence of children—a tried and true Republican tradition at this point.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1211 months ago

        When did this happen?

        The most I’ve heard is that her husband whipped it out in front of her and her friends, she fondled her new play-toy at a Beetlejuice musical, and apparently is OK with public lewdness so long as it’s not with a Democrat. Not sure where this came from.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1011 months ago

          It happened. Her boyfriend was playing with her boobs, and she was giving him an over the pants rub in the theater. There are night vision shots of it that were published at the time. I’m not googling it for you, but try “Boebert Beetlejuice fondling” and that should find it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            311 months ago

            Please point out where she whipped out her boobs.

            Yes, we all know the incident happened. We don’t need to make it any worse than it really is by claiming they did things they never actually did. They groped each other, yes, but at no point did she “whip them out” or actually expose herself or her date.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                511 months ago

                Oh, come on. That’s a load of horseshit and you know it.

                There’s the image. There is zero chance in hell your “wife” saw nipple or anything else. You can barely even make out that his hand is on her boob. She absolutely did not expose herself.

                And the fact that you used the terms “turned on the high beams for her” shows you don’t have a clue what you’re talking about. “High beams” doesn’t mean her tits were out. It means her nipples would have been hard, and from that distance you wouldn’t be able to tell unless she were standing on the chair topless. The fact that she was tucking in a boob means nothing; walk down the street and you’ll see random women making random adjustments all the time. That, and we already know he groped her, so her having to adjust herself shouldn’t be a surprise.

                For the love of God, what she did was bad enough without having to completely make shit up to make it sound even worse.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  011 months ago

                  I love how you put “wife” in quotes as if she’s my imaginary friend, lol.

                  I was trying to bring some humor to the situation with my word choice. It’s a ridiculous story of ridiculous behavior by a ridiculous person. Rather than say high beams, I probably should have said she’s a vapid, hypocritical, idiotic, white trash, no good, dumpster fire of a woman. You can see all that from the video a mile away.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          211 months ago

          He wasn’t her husband when he sexually exposed himself to minors in a bowling alley. The fact he ended up marrying one of them doesn’t make him any less a paedophile.

  • Hyperreality
    link
    fedilink
    7411 months ago

    Oh. Is it time for that Sartre quote again?

    “Never believe that [they] are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. [They] have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.”

    • BraveSirZaphod
      link
      fedilink
      1111 months ago

      I know it’s not hugely relevant to this particular case, but I do think the original context of the quote should be included here, just for completeness if nothing else.

      Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies.

      While he’s discussing anti-semitism, bigots of all kinds use very similar rhetorical strategies. A lot of this stuff did originate with anti-semitism though, and I feel that shouldn’t be forgotten.

  • prole
    link
    English
    4911 months ago

    They don’t even bother trying to pretend they actually believe what they say anymore. They don’t need to, their voters do not care. They probably like it because they think it “owns the libs”.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -9
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            No, they got booted because she refused to stop vaping even though vaping isn’t allowed, mouthed off to a pregnant lady, was generally being obnoxious, and played the “do you know who I am?” card when asked to tone it down. A review of the security footage later showed that she was also fondling him during the performance, but there’s no reports that she exposed herself, outside of the dress itself she was wearing accentuating her cleavage.

            Given her attractiveness, if she whipped her boobs out during that incident, the footage would have made its way to every site from Reddit to Pornhub in record time.

            EDIT: Everybody is linking to the original footage and while yes, they were groping each other. However, at no point did she “whip out her boebs”.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            011 months ago

            When? I’ve never heard of this happening. I heard about her husband whipping it out, but not her.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                111 months ago

                Among other misbehavior at a performance of Beetlejuice the musical, she and her date groped each other within site of children at the show. He fondled her breasts (some say that they appear to be out on the video but I can’t tell) while she gives him a handy through his pants. The video is at the link above.

                At no point did she “whip out her boobs” or anything else. What they did was bad enough, but she did not expose herself or her date. If she had exposed herself, the footage would not be freely shown on TV and would be censored on the internet, along with providing video evidence that would put them both on a sex offender registry.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  111 months ago

                  I said boebs not boobs in the original comment.

                  Also just put of curiousity do you believe that Congresswoman Lauren Boebert was never prostitute.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      811 months ago

      But she just brings the trashy neighbors to Congress with her… Hmm that doesn’t sound quite right. I feel like that idiom got away from me. Kind of like her behavior.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    We need to stop trying to ‘gotcha’ the bastards

    They will never, ever be ashamed and their supporters and media machine will excuse away or outright ignore any hypocrisy. All we are doing is tiring ourselves out.

    presses start button on woodchipper

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1411 months ago

    I think it’s sad the message this sends. Specifically that people of opposite political parties can’t even jerk each other off in public anymore.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1311 months ago

    Was this before or after she masturbated a man and exposed her breasts in public in front of children?

  • @Ghyste
    link
    1011 months ago

    The embodiment of stupidity. She finds new and novel ways to fuck up.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    511 months ago

    If Boebert wanted to just come clean, say that she’s a democrat, and start doing like actual pino, she would be so damn successful.