At work we somehow landed on the topic of how many holes a human has, which then evolved into a heated discussion on the classic question of how many holes does a straw have.

I think it’s two, but some people are convinced that it’s one, which I just don’t understand. What are your thoughts?

  • krayj@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    1 year ago

    1 ‘hole’ if you can call it that. Imagine if the straw started life as a solid cylinder and you had to bore out the inside to turn it into a straw: if that were the case, you would drill 1 hole all the way through it.

    Another analogy is a donut. Would you agree that a donut has just 1 hole? I would say yes. Now stretch that donut vertically untill you have a giant cylinder with a hole in the middle. That’s basically now just a straw. The fact you stretched it doesn’t increase the number of holes it has.

    • experbia@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Imagine if the straw started life as a solid cylinder and you had to bore out the inside to turn it into a straw

      This would mean a straw has a hole, yes. It would be like a donut indeed - donuts are first whole, then have the hole punched out of them. This meets a dictionary definition of a hole (a perforation). A subtractive process has removed an area, leaving a hole.

      But straws aren’t manufactured this way, their solid bits are additively formed around the empty area. I personally don’t think this meets the definition.

      Your topological argument is strong though - both a donut and straw share the same topological feature, but when we use these math abstractions, things can be a bit weird. For instance, a hollow torus (imagine a creme-filled donut that has not yet had its shell penetrated to fill it) has two holes. One might not expect this since it looks like it still only obviously has one, but the “inner torus” consisting of negative space (that represents the hollow) is itself a valid topological hole as well.

      • dgmib@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “This meets a dictionary definition of a hole.

        But straws aren’t manufactured this way, their solid bits are additively formed around the empty area. I personally don’t think this meets the definition.”

        By this logic, how I make a doughnut changes whether it has a hole.

        If I make a long string of dough and then connect the ends together and cook it (a forming process) it doesn’t have a hole.

        If I cut a hole in a dough disc and then cook (a perforation) it has a hole. Even though the final result is identical?

      • On the matter of the doughnut: If you make them at home, you’re almost always just rolling a cylinder and then making it a circle. I have never actually punched a hole out of a doughnut. That would mess up the toroidal shape.

        But also: So you’re saying a straw has 0 holes?

        • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe she’s not, but I am. An intact straw has zero holes. If you stick a pin in the side, it has one. If you stick a pin all the way through, it has two.

    • zalack@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What if you bored from both ends of the cylinder until they meet in the middle?

      There would be two holes until, at the moment of contact, it becomes one?

      Does the method with which the straw shaft is created influence the number of holes it has?

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No, topologically there would be no holes until the moment of contact. This is the same as there being no hole when drilling through from only one side until the surface on the opposing side is broken.

            • livus@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              So what you are saying is, if I dig a hole that doesn’t go anywhere, then that’s not really a hole?

                • livus@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s fascinating. So most of what I would call “holes” are what, in topographical terms, hollows? Depressions?

                  • eu@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I don’t even know if they have a name for that since it can simply be undone by stretching the object, which is allowed under topological rules.

    • wanderingmagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      But here’s the thing. Take that doughnut and stretch it until it’s a cube with two square cutouts in it. Stretch in some of the inner walls. Now you have a house, with a door and a window. Now: does the house have two holes - a door and a window - or does it have one hole?

    • Fanfpkd@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So as you begin to bore, that is one hole. But when you go through the other side, you have in fact made two holes. I think a donut can actually be thought of either as one hole or two holes, or more correctly; two holes that are the same hole.

      Back to the straw; if you make another hole in the side of the straw half way up, would it still have one hole? Or two holes? Or three holes?

      A bit like thinking of the human digestive tract, most of us would agree that your mouth is a different hole to your anus, but we agree that they are in two ends of the same system