Linux has made significant strides, and in 2023, it’s better than ever. However, there are still individuals perpetuating a delusion: that desktop Linux is as user-friendly and productive as its mainstream counterparts. After a few discussions on Lemmy, I believe it’s important to provide a clear review of where Linux falls short as a daily driver for average users.

EDIT: can I just make it clear I don’t agree with this article one bit and think it’s an unhinged polemic?

    • vapeloki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Factual reasons for this please. Besides the horrible, privacy braking, AI stuff, what can photoshop do that gimp can not?

      • TCB13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Collaboration with other Adobe users? Same thing with Office. If one lives in a bubble and doesn’t to collaborate with others then native Linux apps might work and might even deliver a decent workflow. Once you’ve to collaborate with others who use Windows/Mac it’s game over – the “alternatives” aren’t just up to it.

      • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Factual will be relative, and no matter what I say you’ll find a way to turn this into a fight.

        What other apps compete with photoshop besides gimp?

        • vapeloki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You started with “gimp is shit”, so why not provide reasons for it?

          Or is this the apple vs android, coffee vs tea, stick vs automatic kind of subjective argument?

          What other products on windows compete with photoshop in your opinion? I don’t get your reason>!!<

            • lidstah@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Nope. That’s called the burden of proof. You started by saying “gimp is shit”, it’s up to you to prove it, it’s not up to the people responding you to disprove your point of view. What you’re doing right now is called a fallacy and just totally discredit yourself.

              • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                No. Im asking for alternatives, and then saying my opinion is that gimp is shit.

                Making excuses for not answering my question is pretty lame. If I answer you, you won’t answer me. You’ll just attack my opinions and leave. No thanks lol

            • vapeloki@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              The answer is simple, Gimp is the only “full featured” photoshop replacement. And the os doesn’t matter for this. There is no alternative in windows besides gimp. Apples products also fall short.

              And now, why is gimp shit?

                • vapeloki@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You see, I answered your question. Now, where is the answer you promised? Let me guess, you don’t have any?

                  • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    GIMP’s interface can definitely be less intuitive for some users.

                    GIMP does not always seamlessly integrate into professional workflows.

                    Photoshop offers a more extensive set of advanced features and tools, such as advanced text handling, 3D capabilities, etc, which are not as robust in GIMP.

                    GIMP’s CMYK support is not robust at all.

                    GIMP’s non-destructive editing features are poor in comparison to photoshop.

                    GIMP’s native format (XCF) is not as universally compatible as PSD

                    GIMP has significantly fewer learning resources. This is more about the community and less about the software.

                    These are just a few examples.

        • Tibert@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well there is light room, and the more expensive Photoshop online.

          They now offer an online version of maybe full Photoshop. Tho no idea what is included.

          • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I just tried it. It’s super limited. There isn’t even a pen tool. Idk what they’re thinking.

            There is photopea.com, which used to not have ads but I guess they got greedy.