I acknowledge their thumbnail is horrible. They’re a great channel, though!

  • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Doesn’t that gun not engage the electronic firing mechanism if you don’t authenticate via fingerprint? Or am I thinking of a different one?

    • Xanthrax@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m going to do an edit and link a forgotten weapons video to give it credence. You’re correct. I still think someone could easily break the gun away from the holster (including a child), and eventually figure out a way to fire the gun.

      Edit: Also, I’m a pro-arms advocate; I also believe in responsible storage and use.

        • Kecessa
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The only way a gun is safe is by melting it

        • Xanthrax@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I agree. That’s why there should be as many “complications”, as possible. The struggle is making an easily accessible gun, that isn’t accessible to others. It’s a puzzle.

        • PsychedSy
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          On DoD approved safes the time to defeat it is listed. If you’re willing to make noise you can beat them in as little as 30m.