• dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wonder if Jeffries decides he has has enough of this nonsense, and tells the entire Democratic Caucus to vote “present” just to get it over with. Then he can go to the cameras and talk about how the Republicans are so dysfunctional that they needed Democrats to help resolve their differences.

    • gravitas_deficiency
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because he’s forcing the GOP to get its shit together or collapse. And there’s genuinely nothing wrong with that.

      The GOP is effectively using hostage tactics, and they have done for decades at this point. That’s all it appears they know how to do. Jeffries is refusing to negotiate with hostage takers, which is the correct course of action in the long run.

      • Fraylor@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not criticizing you, but in this context it’s bail, like bailing water. Bale is like hay bale.

        • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It doesn’t “serve the people” to help right wing extremist bomb throwers into positions of power after they’ve already attempted to overturn free, democratic elections and tried to install an unelected leader against the will of the electorate.

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Because at some point, work needs to get done there. The nutty wing of the Republican party embraces the standoff, they will have no issue leaving the chair vacant past all the deadlines and into next year. At some point, continuing to play the normal partisan game just plays into their strategy.

        If Republicans can’t agree among themselves, or consent to accepting help from Democrats, then the only thing left is to help them passively.

          • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Yeah, but everybody already knows that the Republicans are insane and only want to destroy government, so they obviously can’t be blamed. Let’s blame the Democrats instead!!!”

        • pottedmeat7910@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I wish I lived in the happy little world you do where both sides see the bigger picture and everyone worked together towards a common goal.

          The loyal opposition doesn’t exist any more. When they embraced Trump, they went scorched earth. Let them sink. With any luck, they’ll lose enough support in the next election to lose their majority.

    • yip-bonk@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Democrats should bail them out again”

      Nope. Remember the orange rapist they cheered into a gruesome idiotic coup attempt? Yeah and Dems should help them?

      NO. WE’RE CLOSED. Red state idiot bastards. Don’t want to get the shit shocked out of you, quit sticking a knife in the socket. No? BZZZT. This is not that difficult.

      They’re destroying institutions and defying science. That is their only purpose. They have no other common goals. We should not help them at all.

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        But part of the Freedom Caucus agenda is to gum up the works. They’re not interested in having government function at all. So it’s possible that they will never, ever come to an agreement. Should the Democrats throw up 212 for Jeffries indefinitely? Or should they use what power they have to steer the Republicans to some sort of conclusion?

        • Treczoks@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          The moment you thought you steered the Republicans will be the last moment before they happily stick a bunch of knives in your back. That is not prejudice, that is experience.

        • dynamojoe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s folly to think that a democrat reaching across the aisle won’t draw back a bloody stump for the effort. A better solution would be five or six republicans in purple districts to negotiate a compromise and vote for Jeffries. The democrats came to govern; It’s not their job to save the GOP from the GOP.