• Tar_Alcaran
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait. What?

    Are you suggesting that building a launch facility with basic necessities in the middle of a ecologically fragile area is the government’s fault?

    • Sigmatics@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There is nothing new about the location of this launch site. There is nothing new about this launch that warrants this extended ecological investigation. If anything it will have much less impact on the surrounding area due to the deluge system. Which has been finished for months, and only now they’re getting around to investigating? Seems like an unnecessarily sequential and bureaucratic process to me that is stifling innovation

      • burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think the “just waiting for a launch license” thing has been misleading a few times in the past, and I suspect that’s going on (or at least was the case) again here. That being said, I do wish that all of these agencies could pay better and staff up enough to get through this type of investigation more quickly.

        Industrial runoff, even of pure fresh water, can really mess with the balance of a brackish area. They should have done sea-launch from the beginning if they didn’t want to be a good neighbor to the public lands around the launch site.

        • Sigmatics@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right, but it doesn’t seem like anyone cared about this piece of nature before SpaceX was there? Of course that doesn’t give them the right to pollute as they want, but at this point it feels like they’re treating it like some kind of special protected reserve