• ssboomman@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Was reading about this on Wikipedia and the truth is even more insane. The caption on Wikipedia is

    “A congolese man, Nsala, looking at the severed hand and foot of his five-year-old daughter who was killed, cooked, and cannibalized by members of the Force Publique”

    All in the name of profits

    • applebusch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      My first thought was, if I was in that situation, I would be planning how to kill whoever did this. Makes sense them being an army would be a pretty big deterrent. I wonder if there was a guerilla resistance of some kind at the time.

      • PugJesus@kbin.socialM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not much. The peoples of the Congo were very isolated from one another, and the Belgians put significant effort in keeping them that way. You had small uprisings, but they were generally local, and dealt with… extremely brutally.

      • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d become the fucking punisher if you did this to me. I would make sure to kill you slow and make you watch as I eat you. Being a parent makes your irrational, and I’d do irrational things to get revenge for my kids.

  • PugJesus@kbin.socialM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 year ago

    The past is often fascinating - but we must also never forget its brutality. No colonial power of the turn of the century was saintly - all were brutal, and often genocidal. But the Belgians in the Congo beat everyone for sheer, pointless cruelty.

  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t understand how someone could do this to a defenseless child and sleep at night.

    • gravitas_deficiency
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s because they convinced themselves that people who aren’t the same color as them aren’t actually people

      • abbadon420@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m convinced my dog isn’t a person, my chickens aren’t people and even the worms in my garden aren’t people. But I would never treat any of those as brutally as the Belgians treated the Congolese. It is absolutely bey9nf my comprehensionsl.

        • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          A better statement would be the Belgians dehumanized the Congolese.

          It’s the opposite of what you do right now with animals, treating them as a pet and something that can suffer is humanizing them.

          It’s why we say we cannot tolerate intolerance - to allow any dehumanization allows for this stuff to happen.

      • PugJesus@kbin.socialM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Many of these atrocities were carried out by their ‘fellow’ Africans in the employ of the Belgians, though the atrocities were generally ordered (or, gruesomely, regulated) by the Europeans. Sadly, people can seemingly dehumanize anyone, regardless of how they look.

  • notaviking@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fucking awefull, may history never forget wimp king leopold ii and the Belgian people that helped destroy the Congo and its people. A kid was mutilated because his father did not meet his slave quota.

  • BeanGoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Truth is a little different. They didn’t chop off your hands for failing to meat a quota. You can’t work without hands, see, so that wouldn’t really help. Naw, they just fucking killed ya. The hands were supposed to be what the soldiers brought back to count how many they killed, to prove they hadn’t wasted ammo. Seriously. The photos of people with just hands cut off were from soldiers cheating the system and just cutting off hands of random people so they could shoot more later. It was fucking barbaric.