• IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Lol of course Valve has a neutral opinion about it. It’s probably Gaben’s libertarian centrist stance.

    • Skua@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 year ago

      This feels more like a politely negative one than a neutral one to me. It’s an expression of disinterest from the devs

      • Heavybell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        “We don’t give enough of a shit to directly speak ill of this technology, and neither should you.” :P

    • ryathal
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Neutral is surprising for a trust less technology from a company that’s a sourof trust.

    • alessandro@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d say Gabe don’t want to spent Valve’s good guy points in anything controversial.

      The reason why big publishers like Capcom and Square Enix, freely publish on Steam (without need for bribe money like Sony, Microsoft and Epic do) is due to the attraction of the “good guy reliability”.

      For example, during Bethesda+Valve pay mod fiasco Valve was quick to share half of the guilt with Bethesda and shut down everything… while of course, Bethesda show they were (and are) all the way in with the concept.

      • cmeow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Valve is in a position where they don’t have to do anything and can still earn several billions per year. $7.6B USD last year, I believe.