• ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    the problem is that it’s using a word that was supposed to specify that something was not hyperbole as hyperbole, rendering it useless.

    … Or… Because it’s a word specifically meant to indicate it is not hyperbolic, using it in that way is literally the superlative hyperbole.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      At the cost of the word’s intended use, unfortunately. RIP literally. It literally died.

      • Classy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Now you have to hit literally in the chest with an adrenaline shot to bring lividity into its decaying body.

        quite literally

        actually literally

        • samus12345@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          A good point, I haven’t seen “quite literally” used to mean “figuratively.” Perhaps there’s some usefulness to be had yet.