Do you think the creator should work for free and get no benefit? Oftentimes what happens is the creator sells the product or idea for a quick payout and then the company that bought the idea or the product will get the opportunity to make a profit off of the “loan” they made to the creator. The company that buys an idea or a product has a much greater ability to market and develop so there is additional benefit as well.
I think a more useful societal structure would alleviate the pressure of this question of whether someone needs to “work for free.” When a lot of basic needs are already met, the incentives change.
Yes, that’s exactly what we want, because there’s only two options and “nothing” is one of them. Well spotted, good job, dunk served, you can leave now.
Do you think the creator should work for free and get no benefit? Oftentimes what happens is the creator sells the product or idea for a quick payout and then the company that bought the idea or the product will get the opportunity to make a profit off of the “loan” they made to the creator. The company that buys an idea or a product has a much greater ability to market and develop so there is additional benefit as well.
But no capitalism bad.
I think a more useful societal structure would alleviate the pressure of this question of whether someone needs to “work for free.” When a lot of basic needs are already met, the incentives change.
But no, questioning status quo bad.
Yes, that’s exactly what we want, because there’s only two options and “nothing” is one of them. Well spotted, good job, dunk served, you can leave now.