• bedrooms@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    48
    ·
    11 months ago

    Wrong. Gaetz started the voting process and Dems could have voted no to keep McCarthy.

    This particular comment of mine is not saying they should have.

    • Djtecha@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is such a dishonest argument. You’re nothing more then a troll.

      • bedrooms@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Can you explain to me why it’s dishonest? I believe I’m just stating facts.

        Edit: What I mean is that I just corrected what OP wrote.

          • fattylumpkin@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            11 months ago

            Jesus Christ, am I on Reddit right now? The guy is spitting facts and getting lectured and downvoted. Are liberals really this sensitive now? It’s mind-blowing to an older guy.

          • bedrooms@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            11 months ago

            It’s dishonest because the Republicans both initiated the vote to remove McCarthy

            This is what I wrote

            and had the numbers to reelect him.

            This is in accordance with what I wrote: Dems could’ve reelected McCarthy.

            While you are correct democrats could have voted for McCarthy,

            Right? And

            I’m not really sure why they should/wpuld as he had already reneged on budgetary issues

            As I clarified in that comment, I was not saying they should.

            So, you’re not disagreeing with me, are you? I therefore don’t see why I’m criticized.

        • Djtecha@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s an intellectually deficint argument. You know the gop called the vote and yet you want to act like this has anything to do with the democrats. The only reason you are pushing this “point” is to try to both sides this bullshit. You are doing nothing but attempting to push a narrative, a lazy one that no one is buying btw.

          • bedrooms@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Wait, it’s not like OP criticized Trump and I said “but Hillary”.

            The OP’s argument was wrong. It was not Mat Gaetz’ “vote”. Dems did choose to oust McCarthy.

            That’s not “both side”. I just corrected OP.

            Edit: the context is that Rs votes split exactly as expected. Dems knew the expectation and chose to oust McCarthy. That’s a fact.

            • Tar_Alcaran
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Edit: the context is that Rs votes split exactly as expected. Dems knew the expectation and chose to oust McCarthy. That’s a fact.

              This can NOT be serious. This argument is on the same level as “I didn’t punch him, I was just swinging my arms wildly and they put their face in the path of my fist”. Are you actually 5 years old, or just pretending?

              • bedrooms@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                As I wrote, Rs against McCarthy didn’t reach majority.

                So, would you please take back that insult? Should I explain further what you don’t understand here?

                • Tar_Alcaran
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Let me flip your argument: US conservatives always knew there would be roughly 212 democratic votes against anything they do.

                  Why would they, with 221 votes in their side, do something like this? If they didn’t want this to happen, why would conservatives take this action?

                  Why do democrats have to clean up conservative messes? Why can’t they be adults and act responsibly?

                  • bedrooms@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Can you explain to me why my comment equated to “I didn’t punch him, I was just swinging my arms wildly and they put their face in the path of my fist”?

                    I don’t see how.

              • bedrooms@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                11 months ago

                You’re just shouting “dishonest”. Can you tell me exactly which part of my text is dishonest? It feels as if you’re in tribalism where you label any inconvenient fact as dishonesty and move on to protect yourself.

            • fattylumpkin@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              It is a fact.

              Really wish Lemmyverse liberals here weren’t exactly as pedantic and defensive as they are on every other social media site.