A judge in Virginia has ruled that a teacher who was shot by her 6-year-old student in class can press forward with a $40 million lawsuit.

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
    link
    fedilink
    1418 months ago

    The school board is basically admitting that teaches are gonna get shot as part of their jobs. That’s so fucked up

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Lawyers for Newport News Public Schools had tried to block the lawsuit, arguing that Zwerner was eligible only for workers’ compensation. It provides up to nearly 10 years pay and lifetime medical care for injuries.

        Zwerner’s attorneys countered that workers’ compensation doesn’t apply because a first-grade teacher would never anticipate getting shot: “It was not an actual risk of her job.”

        This is the good bit though:

        “The actual risk of employment in this scenario is that of a teacher being injured at the hands of a student which, unfortunately, is a fairly common occurrence and one that is only increasing in frequency this day and age,” school board attorney Anne Lahren said in a statement.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          18 months ago

          “It was not an actual risk of her job.”

          So they argued exactly the opposite…

          Also anyone who thinks that’s a “common occurrence” is delusional.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            No, sorry, I probably shouldn’t have included that part of the quote. Zwerner is the teacher that got shot, that’s her attorneys arguing that. The school is trying to claim it is an unfortunate but common occurrence.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1348 months ago

    IIRC the teacher expressed concerns about the student having a gun, and the school administration said something like, “he has tiny pockets! a gun can’t fit in tiny pockets” and she got shot like less than an hour later. I used quotations but it’s not an exact quote.

    • PatFusty
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      122
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      This is actually kind of hilarious, how do you fuck up this bad

      https://apnews.com/article/newport-news-school-shooting-a40dfad64388aadf1f90211177412522

      The administrator downplayed the report from the teacher and the possibility of a gun, saying — and I quote — ‘Well, he has little pockets,’ ”

      Shortly after 1 p.m., another teacher told an administrator that a different student who was “crying and fearful” said the boy showed him the gun during recess and threatened to shoot him if he told anyone. Again, no action was taken, she said.

      When another employee who had heard the boy might have a gun asked an administrator to search the boy, he was turned down, Toscano said. “He was told to wait the situation out because the school day was almost over,” she said.

        • snowe
          link
          fedilink
          338 months ago

          Seems like they’re already giving the incompetent superintendent a golden parachute. 500k for getting someone shot.

        • @atzanteol
          link
          38 months ago

          I’ll give you a little bit to consider what ones life is like after being shot.

        • Piecemakers
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          And they’ll still continue to vote against their interests. 🙄

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        27
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Can we just get whoever these chucklefucks are and ask them why they were so unconcerned with the fact that three different people came to them talking about a 6 year old they’re in charge of being seen with a gun?? Isn’t the normal response to ONE person telling you about a child being seen with a gun on school grounds to actually investigate whatever is going on?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        258 months ago

        I remember when a kid got suspended because he pointed a chicken nugget at a teacher and said bang…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      138 months ago

      When you’ve got this level of stupidity in charge of those expected to educate the next generation, I think you may have already lost.

      • Cethin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        168 months ago

        The school shirked it’s responsibilities. They will be paying, not the kid.

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          78 months ago

          If American schools are supposed to stop school shootings they will be at it all day.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            28 months ago

            She warned them multiple times about issues and rumors of weapons. They did nothing. IIRC the child also had a decently long history of other issues. I would sue that school too.

  • @[email protected]
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    368 months ago

    Forget the school, the individuals in the administration are the ones that need to be sued.

      • @[email protected]
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        19
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Like the school district is going to be able to pay out $40 million.

        Point being, the school district will shoulder all the consequences, or just declare bankruptcy, all at the expense of the taxpayers and the students and teachers that all of those taxes are supposed to be going to, while the actual people that made reckless and criminal decisions face almost no personal consequences.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -148 months ago

          While I agree that the individuals in the administration who touched the issue and failed to act should be at the very least fired for negligence resulting in serious bodily harm, I don’t think they did anything criminal. They made some poor decisions and a woman was hurt under their purview - they did not cause the woman to be shot.

          • @[email protected]
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            178 months ago

            They did commit criminal acts. Criminal negligence and child endangerment. Multiple people reported the existence of a gun on the premises and a person stating intent to use it. Doesnt matter if that person was a child. The administrators knew a gun was in the posession of a child and failed to call the police or secure the weapon.

            I’d throw a charge of child endangerment on those administrators for each child in the school.

            if a gun is reported and you fail to act, you deserve prison.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -78 months ago

              Do you have any examples of this? I can’t think of any cases where somebody was found guilty in a criminal court for failing to act on a report of a firearm being present.

    • Pons_Aelius
      link
      fedilink
      78 months ago

      Not in a civil suit. They were working in their position as the legal authority of the school, making decisions in that role and not as private citizens.

      They were the school and the school is liable.

      • @[email protected]
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        148 months ago

        No, they need individual punishmemt, too. Same with cops. Same with business executives. They all hide behind their position and avoid personal consequences. Like the south park “we’re sorry” episode mocking BP?

        We need to be holding individuals accountable when the institution let’s things happen. It’s the only real way to get bad people out of power.

        • Pons_Aelius
          link
          fedilink
          28 months ago

          Forget the school, the individuals in the administration are the ones that need to be sued.

          No, they need individual punishmemt, too.

          They were not saying as well but instead of.

          Personally, I believe they should be barred from any position in education but that is not what I was replying to.

          • @[email protected]
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            28 months ago

            Barring them isn’t enough. The only acceptable place is prison. Criminal negligence and child endangerment charges at the minimum.

            • Pons_Aelius
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              You have your opinion, I have mine.

              Criminal negligence and child endangerment

              That sounds like something for the person (parent, I assume) that gave the child access to a pistol.

              • Trebach
                link
                fedilink
                18 months ago

                She’s awaiting trial for felony child neglect and allowing a child access to a firearm.

        • Pons_Aelius
          link
          fedilink
          08 months ago

          They were not saying as well but instead of.

          Personally, I believe they should be barred from any position in education but that is not what I was replying to.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    24
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    That 6 yr old is gonna have to work a lot of jobs to pay back that 40 mil, hell of a grindset they worked out

    • ExpensiveConstant
      link
      fedilink
      378 months ago

      I just read the article, she’s suing the school because she claims administrators ignored reports the kid had a gun as well as a history of “troubling behavior”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -238 months ago

        Oh ok, that’s smart, so she bankrupts the school so no kids can come to school with a gun no more since there is no school.

        Goddamn brilliant!

    • @ZzyzxRoad
      link
      168 months ago

      You don’t think that maybe the suit is against the school or the district

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    228 months ago

    I am curious how the involved kid turns out years later, but I feel that answer is already known.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    218 months ago

    Wtf are the kid’s parents doing? Like, how does a 6 year old smuggle a loaded weapon out of the house? And why would they even have that in the house? (I know it’s in the US, that last question was more of a rethorical one.)

    • pewter
      link
      fedilink
      14
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      From what I remember about this case the mother had terrible gun safety (obviously) and the child was mirroring terrible behaviors he’d seen from the father. The father has been accused of aiming a gun at an extra [ex]girlfriend and attempting to choke out another.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    88 months ago

    See guys we do need to arm teachers, preschoolers, 1st -7th graders, the janitor, the lunch lady, etc… /S