A second teacher at a high school in Missouri was put on leave after administrators discovered her OnlyFans side hustle.

Megan Gaither, 31, said during an interview with the St. Louis Post-Dispatch that she was placed on leave from her English teaching and varsity cheerleading coach position on Oct. 27 after district officials found out about her account on the OnlyFans platform.

  • Lizzy Wizzy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    L take and completely wrong. Fuck people for not only judging for something harmless, but also for directly impacting her life because of it when she didn’t impact anyone else’s.

    • Grumpy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What part am I wrong about? Her OF account has clearly affected her job as a teacher. The evidence of what I said is right there. You’re in denial of facts of what has already occurred. If she didn’t see this coming, she’s stupid.

      I don’t care if you think people shouldn’t be judgmental. You’re being judgement of me right now. And I am of you right now. People always are, always have been and always will. That’s how humans work. Your denial or calling it out as bad is irrelevant in your ability to plan for the future.

      Edit: Let me be clear. I am not defending the judgmental. I am pointing out the lack of social understanding.

      • Lizzy Wizzy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        In that same vain then, I shouldn’t dress “slutty” in public otherwise I’m just asking to get raped right? Get fucked.

        • Grumpy
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Because you couldn’t point out what was wrong, you decided to take a strawman? No, that is not the same vain. The logic isn’t consistent.

          It would be: If she doesn’t want to get raped, she should take precautions based on the risks involved.

          If this teacher doesn’t want to be fired, she should understand that there are risks that follow her actions.

          If I follow your logic, the statement of the teacher would become:

          She must’ve wanted to get fired, so she did OF. No, the predicate the consequences are backwards.

          Being stupid is not a defense. And your argument is illogical.

        • Grumpy
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, that is not the same vain. The logic isn’t consistent.

          It would be: If she doesn’t want to get raped, she should take precautions based on the risks involved.

          If this teacher doesn’t want to be fired, she should understand that there are risks that follow her actions.

          If I follow your logic, the statement of the teacher would become:

          She must’ve wanted to get fired, so she did OF. No, the predicate the consequences are backwards.

          Being stupid is not a defense. And your argument is illogical.