• 11 Posts
  • 199 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 16th, 2023

help-circle



  • GrumpytoGamesPEGI gives balatro an 18+ rating
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    NA mostly uses ESRB while most of Europe uses PEGI as their rating board. They’re different organizations so they can have different criterias for rating as well as different inspectors actually doing the rating.





  • GrumpytoMemes@lemmy.mlit's that simple
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s not and such content should be banned from memes. But Lemmy has nearly no moderation on validity of content. Tbh, I like Reddit a lot better in many ways except for the asshole admins. It has problems, but still lot better controlled than here.


  • GrumpytoMemes@lemmy.mlSoftware: Then vs Now
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve already addressed this same argument to the other commenter in length. But if what you say is true, which it is not, then python is not inefficient since it’s already equivalent to C. Thus OP point of something being inefficient because it was made in python is wrong.



  • GrumpytoMemes@lemmy.mlSoftware: Then vs Now
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Nearly every languages’ every core packages are written in C. And almost every higher packages have some amount of C. That doesn’t mean we get to say every program is done in C. And if you keep drilling down, everything is just machine lang. And certainly still disproves the OPs point of inefficient python.

    Saying it’s all done in C hardly even true. Just look at xformers library on GitHub. Only 2.7% of the code is C. And the entire library is about optimizing.

    Additionally, vast majority of the great leaps in ML efficiency changes hasn’t come from better programmed packages, though they too certainly made big strides. How we calculate itself has changed. That’s what makes the greatest optimizations in anything. It doesn’t matter what language it is, doing a loop 1000000 times to add 1 is going to be worse performance than just doing 1 multiplied by 1000000. How we calculate, what we choose to give up (such as determinism in some implementations if SDP attention changes) and such makes big differences.

    Optimizations also has to be done by someone. Whether that be data scientists or otherwise. The ability for higher level languages to enable them to do so like you say also makes a big difference. If all the programmers had to optimize in C only, we’d still be way behind where we are now in performance.

    Just swapping languages doesn’t yield better results like OP is implying.



  • GrumpytoMemes@lemmy.mlSoftware: Then vs Now
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    What makes you think python is in optimized and bloated?

    Did you know vast majority of AI development happening right now is on python? The thing that literally consumes billions of dollars of even-beefier-than-4090 GPUs like A100. Don’t you think if they could do this more efficiently and better on C or assembly, they would do it? They would save billions.

    Reality is that it makes no benefit to move away from python to lower level languages. There is no poor optimization you seek. In fact if they were to try this in lower level languages, they’ll take even longer to optimize and yield worse results.




  • GrumpytoFunnyI'm not fucking around.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yeah, what happened to community spirit and being neighborly? And I mean you. You’re acting like you’re entitled to being an asshole for your convenience at the cost of someone else’s convenience. Someone doesn’t want you to use their stuff for your shit and somehow you think they’re wrong? Get on board with community spirit and stop being an ass.