Exclusive: Special rapporteur Olivier De Schutter to urge ministers to increase welfare spending on visit to country this week

  • Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    What if, and hear me out here, we were to turn the executives into a fine, nutritious powder (with many uses!) and distribute it to the poor?

  • Squizzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    £85 is insane to live on, is that part of a separate payment? The jobseeker’s, dole, disability in Ireland is over twice that. Is social insurance a separate provision?

    • fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You can also get Council Tax benefit, and Housing Benefit (more of a Landlord Benefit, really).

      Council tax benefit saves you either some or all of the local council tax payment (~£1000 - £2500 per year in most places). Amusingly, it tends to be cheaper in wealthy areas.

      Landlord benefit pays a percentage of what the Landlord asks for rent, generally compared to average rents in the area you live - so that might be £2000 - £3000 per year where I live in the North, but £10000 per year down South somewhere. You don’t see any of that money personally, but it helps to make good headlines for angry “newspapers” and government policies.

      There’s additional bits of payment for caring for children under a particular age, disability etc, but generally, yeah, that’s your lot.

      • PsychedSy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        You guys have to pay over 1k pounds to your local towns?

          • PsychedSy
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Okay, so like property taxes here. Gotcha. I was just interested in different methods of collecting funds there are.

            • tankplanker@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I wish we had a proper property tax here that was based on house and land value that was the same nationally. With the way council tax works richer areas, which almost always have more expensive houses and land, pay less annually than the same property in the cheaper area and yet their local council is better funded. A national system is the only way to reverse this.

            • smeg@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t know where your property tax goes, but that might overlap with our Stamp Duty, which is basically our tax on buying a house and is a nationwide government thing. Council Tax I think goes to your local council and is used for things like bin collection, buses, potholes, and local community events (and it keeps going up because the Tories keep cutting the amount that councils get from the government).

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Olivier De Schutter, the UN’s special rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, cited research showing universal credit payments of £85 a week for single adults over 25 were “grossly insufficient” and described the UK’s main welfare system as “a leaking bucket”.

    In an interview with the Guardian five years after his predecessor, Philip Alston, angered the Conservative government by accusing it of the “systematic immiseration of a significant part of the British population”, the Belgian lawyer risked a fresh confrontation by saying: “Things have got worse.”

    De Schutter said the UK had signed an international covenant that created a duty to provide a level of social protection which ensured an adequate standard of living but that it was being broken, with welfare payments falling behind costs for the poorest people.

    “If you look at the price of housing, electricity, the very high levels of inflation for food items over the past couple of years, I believe that the £85 a week for adults is too low to protect people from poverty, and that is in violation of article nine of the international covenant on economic, social [aand cultural] rights.

    According to the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, in 2022 3.8 million people experienced destitution (struggling to afford to meet their most basic physical needs to stay warm, dry, clean and fed).

    Alston, an internationally respected human rights lawyer, said “much of the glue that has held British society together since the second world war has been deliberately removed and replaced with a harsh and uncaring ethos”.


    The original article contains 788 words, the summary contains 255 words. Saved 68%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

      • Blue and Orange@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I really don’t know what people expect of the UN. It’s far from perfect, but it’s still a means of getting countries to engage in some sort of dialogue and for countries to scrutinize each others actions. Granted, the original attempt (the League of Nations) failed to prevent WW2 but that was no reason not to try again. We might not gain much from the existence of the UN, but we stand to lose a heck of a lot without it.

        • 9point6@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          The only people that really stand to benefit from losing the UN are fascists and other malignant autocrats. Aye it’s not perfect, but it’s better than nothing.

          Anyone that doesn’t agree with that is either also malignant or uninformed enough to fall for fascist propaganda.

      • guriinii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s just a load of people saying we don’t like what you’re doing, this thing is bad, don’t do that. That’s it. For something that was setup to prevent atrocities like we’re seeing in Palestine, and have been seeing for 75 years, historically, it’s done, and continues to do, a pretty terrible job.

        • ThePyroPython@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          The UN wasn’t set up to prevent atrocities like Palestine/Israel.

          It was set up to prevent large multi-nation conflicts like WW1 and WW2 by providing a platform for dialogue & diplomacy between multiple countries WITH a standing army acting as a peacekeeping force.

          Unfortunately, proxy conflicts like Israel/Palestine still occur.