• Duchess@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    i’ve never kept cats but i feel like 3 is a fine amount to have. 4 is a little much though.

    • kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago
      1. You have a cat.
      2. Cat needs a friend.
      3. You have a lot of cats.
      4. Crazy cat lady confirmed.

      I’m at 2 and really need to aim higher.

  • fugepe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hard for me to understand people having several pets. I had one and it was somewhat demanding

    • SuperMandy@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Depending on the pets, sometimes two can be less work than one. They entertain each other and play together, resulting in less destruction and less demand for attention from their owner. That probably all goes out the window with more than two though!

    • chetradley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The threshold that someone considers “too many animals” is always the number they have plus one.

        • Freeman@lemmy.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          For us it’s feet

          Pet feet cannot outnumber human feet, full stop. Otherwise you lose control and are no longer in charge.

          It’s a working theory but so far has been accurate.

          • kenbw2@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I see a couple of flaws

            1. Nobody who lives alone is allowed a pet
            2. If you have a toddler, in this rule that enables you to expand the number of pets, but I’d say a toddler adds to rather than eases the load