J4g2F@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoCan't have to manylemmy.mlimagemessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up119arrow-down10
arrow-up119arrow-down1imageCan't have to manylemmy.mlJ4g2F@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squarechetradley@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoThe threshold that someone considers “too many animals” is always the number they have plus one.
minus-squareFreeman@lemmy.publinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoFor us it’s feet Pet feet cannot outnumber human feet, full stop. Otherwise you lose control and are no longer in charge. It’s a working theory but so far has been accurate.
minus-squarekenbw2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI see a couple of flaws Nobody who lives alone is allowed a pet If you have a toddler, in this rule that enables you to expand the number of pets, but I’d say a toddler adds to rather than eases the load
minus-squareGlyphicus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoA person living on their own could have any number of fish, a single bird, any number of snakes, etc.
The threshold that someone considers “too many animals” is always the number they have plus one.
deleted by creator
For us it’s feet
Pet feet cannot outnumber human feet, full stop. Otherwise you lose control and are no longer in charge.
It’s a working theory but so far has been accurate.
I see a couple of flaws
A person living on their own could have any number of fish, a single bird, any number of snakes, etc.