La Trobe University research shows Australians would prefer to embrace many other green options to help the environment before giving up meat and becoming vegetarians.

  • A study shows Australians would rather take other actions to help the environment than give up meat.

  • Participants cite a lack of vegetarian options when dining out, despite Australia having more than ever, as a barrier to the diet.

  • Researchers hope the study will highlight reasons behind people’s reluctance to reduce meat consumption.

  • spacecowboy
    312·
    1 year ago

    Most people aren’t going to voluntarily do anything that drastically changes their life. Big fuckin surprise.

    • CaptFeather@lemm.ee
      88·
      1 year ago

      Honestly I wouldn’t consider this a drastic change to life considering how easy it is to do lmao. My best friend/roommate is vegan while I’m a meat eater. Wherenever she’s home at dinner time I’ll cook for both of and make sure it’s something we can both eat so it’s more often than not vegan meals. You know what’s happened since? I’ve just gotten noticeably healthier lmao. I’ll still eat meat on occasion (more often than not poultry), but if I never had it for the rest of my life I honestly wouldn’t mind much.

    • BruceTwarzen@kbin.social
      38·
      1 year ago

      Drastically change their life? Not buying meat is pretty drastic. Where do you even begin? Buy meat and throw it away? Help

  • DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone
    276·
    1 year ago

    This is such a bullshit response. There are plenty of vegetarian options when eating out in Australia. And the more vegetarians there are, the more options restaurants will offer.

    • fiat_lux@kbin.social
      183·
      1 year ago

      City? Yeah, if you pay a fair whack or live near one of the buddhist or hindu country diaspora hubs. Out bush? Yeah, nah. There will be one menu item, maybe two if you include the garden salad as being a meal.

      • DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone
        71·
        1 year ago

        Yeah that’s true. I’m a city dweller and spoilt for choice. But I reckon if more people were asking for it out bush, the restaurants would update their menus.

      • wildwhitehorses@aussie.zone
        3·
        1 year ago

        Also depends on the city I imagine. I now describe myself as an “omnivore who prefers to not eat the animals” due to desperate times when going out…

        • fiat_lux@kbin.social
          3·
          1 year ago

          Depends what you even call “city” really. Even in the most populated capital, things can get really dire in the outer suburban sprawl. Especially if they’re mostly Anglo-european suburbs. Your choices start to be mostly “vegetarian burger using frozen gross patties” at the local bowling club or “pre-frozen falafel kebab”. And the “don’t add meat” option at the ubiquitous Chinese and Thai joints.

  • vividspecter@lemm.ee
    171·
    1 year ago

    A study shows Australians would rather take other actions to help the environment than give up meat.

    So exactly the same as polling on alternatives to the Voice. Australians want vague solutions to problems they pretend to care about, but when you propose actual solutions: crickets.

    • MHLoppy2@aussie.zoneOP
      16·
      1 year ago

      The list of options participants were given:

      • Eat less meat (50% reduction)
      • Stop eating meat
      • Avoid food products imported by plane
      • Use public transport
      • Recycle things more
      • Buy fewer new things
      • More energy from renewable sources

      Some of it is a bit less actionable then “eat less meat”, but they’re still pretty concrete.

      • vividspecter@lemm.ee
        2·
        1 year ago

        The willingness seems pretty low on everything but “renewable sources” and recycling which requires the least effort from people.

        There being some willingness to reduce meat is nice, but I’ve heard that line before (people rarely follow through in practice).

        • MHLoppy2@aussie.zoneOPEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          I guess there’s going to be some interpretation about what a high vs low result really is (like how a 6/10 rated game or movie is “low”). I personally thought the raw results would have been lower based on some of the doomposting elsewhere in the thread.

      • Nath@aussie.zone
        1·
        1 year ago

        I have already done all these except #2. And yes - I mean that. I have changed my lifestyle over the past 10-15 years doing these things consciously.

      • metaStatic@kbin.social
        36·
        1 year ago

        Australia was and, despite the best efforts of the Yes campaign, continues to remain and egalitarian liberal democracy.

  • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    123·
    1 year ago

    Lol lmao. Everyone who is like “I’d give up meat if only there were more options at restaurants” should immediately give it up except at restaurants where there are no meatless options in order to fulfill their own stated values.

    Of course, my bet is it’s just a rationalisation. Our culture sucks and people are always looking for some reason why doing the bare minimum is unreasonable.

  • theonyltruemupf@feddit.de
    116·
    1 year ago

    Participants cite a lack of vegetarian options when dining out

    Well it’s not a religion. Eat meat if you don’t find anything else on the menu. Avoid it when cooking yourself. But it’s not about that, people are addicted to meat and don’t want to reduce their consumption.

  • roo@lemmy.one
    52·
    1 year ago

    Wait. You think Australians will take action. Hahahahaha

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldBEnglish
    2·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:

    Australians love eating meat and say limited vegetarian options when dining out is a key barrier to changing their diet, despite more meat-free choices than ever, new research has found.

    The report found respondents, who were aged between 18 and 84, believed reducing and eliminating meat intake were ineffective ways to address climate change.

    “Although past research has shown that animal agriculture contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions, our participants believed reducing and eliminating meat intake to be some of the least effective actions against climate change,” co-author and provisional psychologist from La Trobe University Ashley Rattenbury said.

    Two thirds of the La Trobe University study participants said having limited options when eating out was a barrier to adopting a vegetarian diet.

    The La Trobe research was compared to a similar study conducted in 2003 by Emma Lea and Anthony Worsley, from Deakin University, which asked hundreds of Australians for their beliefs about barriers and benefits to vegetarianism.

    The La Trobe University study also asked participants about their perceptions of the effectiveness of stopping or reducing meat consumption, compared to how willing they would be to engage in other actions that benefited the environment.

    The original article contains 429 words, the summary contains 189 words. Saved 56%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      21·
      1 year ago

      Not eating the cows to instead only cultivate them on a smaller scale, for milk, is still better though.

  • 50MYT@aussie.zone
    1617·
    1 year ago

    A very thick ribeye, cooked 5 mins each side then the ends.

    A lamb rack, perfectly roasted in the oven.

    Pork belly, crackling, Asian style.

    Bacon.