• Chefdano3@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    I took me far too long in the article too realize that it was not about trying to intentionally roll the car over.

    • MelastSB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ye, is “flip your low-VIN [car]” technical jargon or was I supposed to understand it?

      • accideath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        To flip something, in this context, means to sell it.

        And a VIN is a Vehicle Identification Number. It’s essentially the serial number of the car, with a lower number indicating an earlier production time.

        So in short, Tesla will sue people who are trying to resell their early production model cybertrucks.

        • No_@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Which is completely ridiculous btw. People can do whatever the fuck they want with their own property. Tesla can eat a monkey brain chip.

          • gravitas_deficiency
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If it’s a long-term lease, like Honda did with their Insight hydrogen fuel cell cars, you could actually make an agreement something like this. But if it’s an outright purchase, Tesla trying to outright restrict resales is possibly illegal.

          • accideath@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Unless they signed something that would prohibit the resell (like you cannot legally resell PlayStation developer kits, because they‘re still legally owned by Sony), yea, it’s their property. Nothing Tesla can do.

  • eestileib
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    I saw one on the road the other day and they’re even uglier and more ungainly in person.

    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wait - they broke out of Musk’s evergreen “yeah - the thing I’m talking about is just a couple of short years from delivery, abs it’ll be great”?

      • BrandonMatrick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are about a dozen “proof of concept” models out in the wild, mostly owned by Tesla execs and buddies of Elmo. There’s one cruising around in Austin, apparently.

        • eestileib
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This one was in a suburb of San Jose, and had Texas plates.

          So ugly.

  • LifeOfChance@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    How would that even work? If someone owns the vehicle how do they tell that person what they can or can not do with it?

  • Kecessa
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Good luck enforcing that anywhere where they have customer protection laws. Hey, I would love to see a rich person going to court just to settle that once and for all.

    Heck, what can they do if I give it to a friend? They can’t prove said friend then sent me a cheque to pay for it.