• cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    So if a bank robber took a cashier as a hostage, you’d suggest to just shoot the hostage, to get to the bank robber?

    • ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Comparing actions being taken in a war being fought over an area larger than that of Delaware to that of a bank robbery is too reductionist to give any sort of meaningful response to.

      • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was mainly focusing on the validity of taking out hostages in order to get to the bad guys.

        • ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          War fucking sucks, and sometimes the only way to save 10,000 lives is to end 100. Every country has limited resources to deal with hostage situations in active warzones.

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hahaha isreali loses are less than 2000 by all the numbers I’ve found, Palestinians dead 10000+, Palestinians injured 30000.

            You’re correct, scale matters.

          • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The thing though is, that this is not the case with IDF. They have plenty resources, enough to be selling to the rest of the world actually, and they are not preventing an impending attack. It seems like their motives are somewhere else