• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t be daft, that isn’t how it works. When it is night then the moon will be in the way.

      • zappson@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Twilight may work then. They just need to thread the needle using beam-forming to ensure the comms make it past those pesky celestial bodies.

  • threelonmusketeers
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can we put some relay satellites at the L4 and L5 Lagrange points already? It seems like something we should have done years ago…

    • marsokod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can we? Yes. Should we do it right now? That’s debatable.

      The question is how much this would cost vs getting a two weeks offline every 26 months?

      These two weeks do not create any additional requirements (you already have to make sure the probes can survive for a few weeks without comms), science does not fully stops during these two weeks. And it gives an opportunity to do long duration maintenance on the ground segment.

      Frankly, there is little need to spend >$100M for such relays satellites until we actually have a permanent human presence on Mars.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even when we have a permanent human presence on Mars, there isn’t a great necessity to maintain contact for those two weeks. Even if something goes wrong, it’s not like anyone could send help. Essentially it would be just so we knew what was going on, but that’s not really a full time requirement.

    • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem you face with that idea is that the satellites will have to have enough power to retransmit signals.

      While the Mars > L3/L4 > Earth route is not much of an issue as the large receivers on earth can deal with a small power output at Lagrange. A signal moving in the other direction will have to be quite powerful to reach the small receivers on the Mars end.

      • threelonmusketeers
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        L3

        Did you mean L5? L3 is always in line with the sun, so it doesn’t seem like it would be useful for communication.

        A signal moving in the other direction will have to be quite powerful to reach the small receivers on the Mars end.

        Would it be easier to have a separate satellite for each direction, one at the Earth-Sun L4 point, and one at the Mars-Sun L4 point? Could we get a large enough dish to the Earth-Sun L4 point?

        Alternatively, could we use lasers instead of radio? The SpaceX Starlink satellites have laser inter-links, and NASA just sent up the ILLUMA-T payload to the ISS last week.

        • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pretty much. For it to be effective as a relay it would need some large dishes and a large power supply (large solar array) plus a good amount of propellant for station keeping.

          So it would be a quite expensive option when it is only really required for a few weeks a year.

          Also with the mass it would likely have to be I doubt there was a heavy lift rocket that could do the job in recent times until Falcon Heavy came along.

          • threelonmusketeers
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            plus a good amount of propellant for station keeping

            Aren’t L4 and L5 naturally stable points? A large propellant budget shouldn’t be required for station keeping.

            • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              They are much more stable than other locations but are not completely stable, so station keeping is required. In a theoretical two body system Lagrange points would be perfectly stable but that is not the case with the solar system. Eg: The orbit of the moon ever so slightly effects the Sun - Earth Lagrange points.

              The JWST is a good example. The expected observational lifespan of the telescope is based on how long it is able to remain at L2.

              NASA Says Webb’s Excess Fuel Likely to Extend its Lifetime Expectations

              • threelonmusketeers
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                The JWST is a good example. The expected observational lifespan of the telescope is based on how long it is able to remain at L2.

                I thought L1, L2, and L3 were unstable but L4 and L5 were stable. Hence why asteroids and other detritus tend to collect at L4/L5.

                Edit: Huh, it looks like the stability of L4 and L5 are dependent on the mass ratio of the two bodies. The ratio works out for the Sun-Earth system, so it should also work for the Sun-Mars system.

        • bstix@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          But is it necessary?

          If Musk ever gets to Mars the lack of communication for two weeks will be the best part of the project.

          • Jay
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            They should try something with magnets.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s no pressing time urgency. It’s okay to wait 2 weeks so yeah we could but it’s an enormous expense and not worth it

    • brianorca@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      We use very large radio dishes to communicate with craft at Mars, so that the spacecraft can use smaller dishes and less power. In order to add a relay at L4/L5, that relay would also need very large dishes and high power usage to reach the craft at Mars. Probably larger than anything we have in earth orbit today.

      • threelonmusketeers
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Could we use lasers instead of radio, like the Starlink laser inter-links or the NASA ILLUMA-T/LCRD demonstration?

        • brianorca@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe in the future, but the existing Mars orbiters need to hear a strong radio signal. And laser communication has not yet been tested outside of Earth orbit. It will need to be significantly scaled up to handle the 2-3AU distance.

  • Damaskox@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “My dear robots - we must not talk. We are being eavesdropped.
    Let us contact later!”

    • threelonmusketeers
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Is this a reference to young lovers of Victorian England communicating via encrypted messages via the personal columns in newspapers?

      These “agony columns,” as they became known, provoked the curiosity of cryptanalysts, who would scan the notes and try to decipher their titillating contents. Charles Babbage is known to have indulged in this activity, along with his friends Sir Charles Wheatstone and Baron Lyon Playfair, who together were responsible for developing the deft Playfair cipher (described in Appendix E).

      On one occasion, Wheatstone deciphered a note in The Times from an Oxford student, suggesting to his true love that they elope. A few days later, Wheatstone inserted his own message, encrypted in the same cipher, advising the couple against this rebellious and rash action. Shortly afterward there appeared a third message, this time unencrypted and from the lady in question: “Dear Charlie, Write no more. Our cipher is discovered.”

      The Code Book, by Simon Singh (page 80)

      • Damaskox@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Hehe. I didn’t think of any references.

        Glad that you experienced an association though!

    • Captain Aggravated
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are two kinds of days: slow news days, and tragedies. Which do you prefer? It gets worse, or it stays the same.

        • Captain Aggravated
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          A school gets shot up, or it doesn’t. Another genocide starts, or it doesn’t. A telescope collapses, or it doesn’t. It gets worse, or it stays the same. Not once in all my life has the evening news been like “This just in: A clean, abundant and inexpensive source of energy has been found which is leading to millions of hungry people being fed. We now go on location to ABC correspondent Tish Yu for the details.”