• Nate@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m going to be in the market for a camera soon, and I’ll never touch a Canon because of their printers. If they want good brand recognition they have to earn it and they have not for me

        • BenVimes@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          The only Canon printer I ever owned was a piece of garbage. For whatever reason, I couldn’t just select my home wifi from a list like literally any other network-enabled device. I instead had to select an option buried several layers deep in the menus to have it try to automatically connect to an open network. Only after waiting 5 minutes for this to fail would it show a list of available networks.

          Of course, it also forgot the network and password settings every time it lost power, so I had to go through the whole process again after time I unplugged the thing to clean behind the shelf.

        • Nate@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve never had much luck with the consumer level canon printers, absolute pieces of shit. I used to sell printers and would steer people towards brother or Epson. However last I saw, canon did still have printers that could be used entirely offline.

      • averagedrunk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        Brother is the only printer company I like. I’ve had a workhorse for ages and it is still going strong.

        I’ve been using them for 20ish years and never had any more trouble than routine maintenance.

    • vaultdweller013
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Estate sales, yard sales, and tech scrappers/recyclers tend to have em as well.