• Kit Sorens@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve only experienced that from them since I’ve known them. Not one wants a good faith discussion until you grovel to their fundamentalist tripe. Unity to them means blindly following their half-understood theories of centuries-dead men, and anyone who questions a lick of it gets the 4chan swarm treatment.

        • Kuori [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          58
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          OP literally did not attempt to have any discussion of any kind, and explicitly said they had no interest in doing so

          that’s the definition of “not in good faith” homie

            • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              33
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              No, good faith argument is being a debatelord, as was explained to me at length in the last post. People who just happen to see the post and respond are all brigading if they come from an instance that has a cross-post. Them’s the rules.

              Don’t bullshit me that there is a proper way to argue with that fucker, he demonstrated at length that there was not.

            • jaywalker [they/them, any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              24
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Why can’t an OP have a good faith argument if the post gets “brigaded”? That doesn’t really make sense to me. Anyone can choose to argue in good faith regardless of how the other party behaves.

              • BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Well for several reasons.

                1. You have to find someone who actually wants to have a good faith argument with you.

                2. You have to be disciplined enough to only argue with them, as you will expend energy arguing with the 500 other commenters who are just trolling you.

                3. Actually be able to go through your inbox and find the replies of the person you think is actually acting in good faith.

                4. Be in the mood to argue in good faith. Which is unlikely from the begining, basically impossible at the end.

          • Jax
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah it’s almost like OP uno reversed

          • Kit Sorens@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            When they don’t have a counterargument, they attack your character. It shows just how strong their foundation of understanding is that a simple debate or differing viewpoint is a dire threat to their entire worldview. It’s extremely pathetic tbh.

            • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I think they just observed that you generally ignored the counterarguments and correctly concluded that presenting yet another to you is absurd, but of course you pick that as the comment you respond to

              Also calling someone a dweeb isn’t a character attack, like calling them a moron isn’t.

              I’d fucking love to talk with someone here on terms of argument and counterargument, but that is considered “sealioning” by every fucker I’ve encountered so far on this worthless anarcho-bidenist instance

              • Kit Sorens@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Any form of name-calling or declaration in regards to the individual and not the subject of debate is an appeal to character, and is the last resort of those who can’t support their claim, second to violence.

                If I have “ignored” responses, it is because my app has not notified me that I have a response to a comment. To my knowledge, I have responded in-kind to every comment regarding this post, and even if I hadn’t, one cannot be compelled to respond to every argument or point. It is entirely reasonable for me, on my own judgement, to deem a reply to be a waste of time or nothing worth adding to or drawing attention toward.

                Lastly, if you would like to make a claim and prove good faith, please do so here or in DMs. I would love to discuss philosophy and ethics. But let’s do so in our own words. Quoting Manifestos will be just as effective to a productive discussion as quoting religious scripture. Convince me. Don’t beat me with a dead man’s words.

  • Kuori [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    does the work of the feds by intentionally seeding distrust between leftists

    gets called a fed by leftists

    “time to fill my diaper about it!”

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The fact that you numbskulls don’t even realize how significant fedjacketing is and why we don’t do it, just says everything one needs to know.

  • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hey so I think you’re pretty rad person who’s obviously investing a lot of effort in setting up cool communities and making tools to keep them safe.

    I also think you got unfairly dogpiled in a pretty frustrating way.

    But further, it seemed to me you were not trying to de-escalate there. I know the hexbear dogpile can be a bit ridiculous (honestly that place confuses me, I see both the absolute sanest and most unhinged posts coming out of hexbear users) but at this point you are definitely feeding the trolls.

    I get that this might be fun for you, but it does use up a lot of bandwidth in the community and I worry it harms the quality of conversations we might be able to have in the future.

    Once again I want to be clear that this remark comes from a place of respect, you obviously care about fostering online community and hence this last couple of days is confusing to me.

      • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m not sure if you’re aware but db0 has been working on CSAM filtering, safe federation lists and similar.

        Maybe cut them some slack? That’s certainly more work than I put in.

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I didn’t remember, though if this is the AI guy then I did read the post. I still need to question the deeply antisocial behavior patterns when it comes to anything having to do with communication, though.

          Not that we shouldn’t give them credit for whatever good they do, we should.

            • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Is it hyperbolic when the flame war was of their making and has been stoked and perpetuated by that same user posting more and more about it ever since?

              • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yes it is. Being teased in a comment section is one of the mildest things that can happen to you online.

                Deeply antisocial is language that applies to stuff like the extremely normal rape and death threats, dick pics, and harassment that happens all the time.

                It’s not like they’re pming you, just view a different page.

                • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  15
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes it is. Being teased in a comment section is one of the mildest things that can happen to you online.

                  And that is why you’re siding with the person that made this entire thread (and the prior thread it refers to) because of reasons totally not like “being teased in a comment section.” galaxy-brain

                  It’s not like they’re pming you, just view a different page

                  Unlike the poster you’re championing, who needs to heroically continue the crybully crusade.

                • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Being teased in a comment section is one of the mildest things that can happen to you online.

                  You’ve got another person here saying it is one step down from violence. Does it depend on the sect of the person doing it?

            • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              When someone is posting enough to be nearly half the flame war, including resurrecting it in a new thread because they just need the attention ig, it provides a pretty large data set.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Least suspicious mysterious stranger stanning very hard for a smol bean poster in a way that doesn’t seem like Scott Adams pretending to be his own feeemale fan to praise himself.

        • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think that’s a stretch, seems to be a person that recognises a situation that is escalating and doesn’t want it to, so they’re using extremely diplomatic language in order to try to get through without being lumped into the “my enemies” crowd by db0.

          Which is a good thing. This whole thing is stupid and it stopping would be good and healthier for everyone.

          • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’d be more inclined to agree with you if they didn’t already do a grandiose and hypocritical “you must be unwell, touch grass touch grass touch grass” rage post at me a little bit before now. The “diplomatic” thing seems very selectively delivered here.

            • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Them being diplomatic in one case doesn’t mean any real pretense of impartiality. I don’t like really anyone on that instance, but I would consider this to be not it.

              • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                The “impartial” seemed more like fawning praise, presumably because of some software that the shitposter contributed.

                I never subscribed to the “tortured genius” theory of celebrities, and I also don’t subscribe to cruder versions like “people get a pass to be assholes if they produce treats.”

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s understand the concern. This is just how I deal with this stuff myself. I can absorb a lot off abusive behaviour but I have to blow off some steam somehow, and this is my way.

      Unlike what hexbears might say, I’m not trying to goad them. Notice that I never went out of my way to invite their dogpiles.

      • Alaskaball [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not trying to goad them. Notice that I never went out of my way to invite their dogpiles.

        My sweet little pain piggy, you keep letting out clarion calls that summons all the silly bears out of every nook and cranny of the lemmynet

      • Ram_The_Manparts [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Unlike what hexbears might say, I’m not trying to goad them.

        You literally put the hexbear logo in the whiny little meme you’ve posted here.

        You’re not fooling anyone with your reddit-tier bs lmao

      • LaBellaLotta [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        We are explicitly a left unity community and Your first (racist) meme was explicitly against left unity and you literally included our logo in this one. If that isn’t goading us what would be in your eyes?

      • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah idk you defs don’t want spaces dominated by the norms of whoever is the most annoying. I’ve wasted far too much time at meetings with certain pot stirrers interjecting with their own little axe at every chance.

        I’m just very weary of fostering tribalism and shit slinging in a time when the left is roundly loosing in the majority of the most powerful countries.

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Eh the death of the left has been greatly exaggerated. Sure parliamentary left is “losing” but parliamentary left was worse than useless anyway. Spare no tears for that. Struggle breeds radicalization and if you are looking you will see that the embers are already flaming.

          Anyway I’m not trying to do tribalism. I could have easily followed the trend and defederated if that was my goal. I actually like the chance to be criticized from the left. I’m not perfect. But I do have some strong convictions as well.

          • LaBellaLotta [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            “I actually like the chance to be criticized from the left.“

            Is this a joke? Every good faith criticism you have received from the left you act as if it is some dog pile attack and like you didn’t invite this debate with your first extremely divisive (and racist) meme. You kept repeating Ad Nauseum that you “didn’t owe anyone a debate” and telling us we’re “sea lioning”. Guess what dipshit? You know what criticism from the left is going to feel like: A DEBATE!

            In what way does that behavior demonstrate that you are in any way open to left criticism? I presume you just conveniently omit anyone who you see as a “Tankie” from “the left” you are ok being criticized by.

            You are a terminally reddit brained person who colors themself as an Anarchist because you like the aesthetic. You are happy to punch left and carry water for Imperialism because it gives you some individualistic and smug sense of moral correctness. That feeling is obviously more important to you than understanding AES states on their terms and learning from what they did right and what they did wrong without moralizing like the child that you are.

            Your convictions are as strong as apple sauce. These two posts have made it abundantly clear to me that without some fucking humility, self Crit, and willingness to engage with other leftists who disagree with you (re: DEBATE) you are the kind of “leftist” who would sell out a successful left wing movement if there ever was one because they were “too authoritarian”

            If Hexbear users are so bad do us a favor and de-federate because this is clearly a waste of everyone’s time and energy.

          • vasco@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I could have easily followed the trend and defederated if that was my goal.

            This is very awesome of you I must say. I was hoping some real friendship from both sides could happen here.

      • ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You kicked the extremist groupthink hornet’s nest by mentioning them. Whenever I give one of them shit, 10 more show up out of the woodwork.

  • Doubledee [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well it works for us on Hexbear. That’s actually what I like about it, it’s a nice big tent over there. Some of our greatest posters are anarchists, they were indispensable on the frontline of the posting wars that followed federation. rat-salute

  • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not sure I really agree with your first point, I think finding a way to find allys in all leftists would be worth it, even if it has a dark history. Things can be better.

    But holy shit their reaction was intense. And the idea that their arguments were in defense of left unity was pretty silly… 99% of it was just “anarchists wrong and evil”, and there is wild amounts of sectarianism going on just within hexbear that I’m sure lent energy to this.

    I respect how you reacted under pressure. I really respect any admin of a website that can show that much restraint when dealing with personal attacks and people you explicitly disagree with.

    But yeah the lethality of leftist infighting is maybe a topic that deserves more delicate conversations than memes.

      • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was there, I can form my own opinions, thanks. It was hyperbole, but that was the general level of arguments being made.

        If you want left unity, it was a nonsensical way to behave. It was just more sectarianism. It does make sense as a way to behave if you just wanna argue… So thats what I assume the real intent was.

        • iie [they/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          43
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          the meme being posted was “modern MLs are bloodthirsty monsters who will kill you if they ever get in power”

          When you view a group as evil, that view tends to result in double standards for behavior, which is what you’re doing.

          I’m probably going to dip because I’m too mad to be civil right now

          • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Hi, if you read what I said I also did not like the meme originally posted. I’m just trying to be constructive about it instead of angey and loud.

            Edit: “angey” was a typo but it makes me laugh

          • DivineChaos100 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            the meme being posted was “modern MLs are bloodthirsty monsters who will kill you if they ever get in power”

            And y’all had a chance to prove the meme wrong by not turning it into a dick measuring contest with spamming equally shitty sectarian shit that on hexbear would get you kicked out (anarchists are worthless, anarchists can’t coordinate, etc.),. And it always ends like this. Anytime i mention that in the hungarian revolution the workers councils were a way more significant factor than any western influence and they literally set up groups to hunt nazis the same agresszive smug shit arrives from people who never read anything about the topic apart from the fucking Aptheker book. I feel like the ML userbase (who are right about basically anything when it comes to capitalism) would rather off themselves that even admit that any ml leader even marginally engaged in self-serving abuse of power. Of course anarchists who aren’t familiar with the site wont be happy.

                • alcoholicorn [comrade/them, doe/deer]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  All three are examples of ml leaders who took huge Ls abusing their power that nobody is afraid to criticize. I’m not familiar enough with the boiled baby guy to say whether he was actually an ml or if it was another pol pot situation.

            • iie [they/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t know much about the Hungarian uprising. If the Soviet response was unjustified and draconian when they could have worked something out, that’s fucked up.

              Do you have any reading recommendations?

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks for your kind words. I will admit I did get snappy towards the end of the day as I was getting tired and they had gone to straight up brigading tactics with half a dozen hexbears shitposting random replies, so there wasn’t even any point to reply anymore. It had just become a classic pile on situation because I hurt their feelings.

      I’m not sure I really agree with your first point, I think finding a way to find allys in all leftists would be worth it, even if it has a dark history. Things can be better.

      I’m not here to stop anyone. MLs can be allies when they act like anarchists, which they tend to do when they’re not in power. But you have to be cognizant who you’re getting in bed with.

      • Ram_The_Manparts [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you think that all ML’s harbor some innate desire to just start murdering anarchists for no particular reason when given the chance or something?

        This weird self-induced paranoia can’t be good for you.

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          No. I think that the praxis of MLs eventually leads to ice axes in heads “for the good of the revolution”. I believe you currently never would imagine you would make such an action. I also believe that your hierarchical states will inevitably lead to it

          • Ram_The_Manparts [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Ah, yes. I suppose Marxism-Leninism inevitably drives people to murder, just like Islam inevitably drives people to murder.

            All Marxist-Leninists are the same, just like all those swarthy Muslamics.

            That seems like a perfectly reasonable view of reality you’ve got there lmao

              • Ram_The_Manparts [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You’ve made it perfectly clear that you are not interested in a debate.

                Which means that we can all just throw out the most ridiculous claims possible without having to defend them.

                Funny how that works miyazaki-laugh

              • ThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Let’s not pretend racism isn’t directly connected to shitting on the dominant ideology of non white or conditionally white leftists

                It took me calling the original meme racist over several hours before you edited it, and you should have noticed it in the first place. It incorrectly characterizes Mao, who was heavily influenced by anarchist thought. Integrating the good parts of anarchism into ML thought is kind of the thing he is known for, and to the extent he was successful is where a big portion of controversy around his theoretical contributions to socialism lie.

                Also literally read anything about Jewish intellectual traditions and how they relate to Marxism, God damn.

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Galaxy-brain (not living up to his name) just implied that you “deserve” an ice axe in your head in a reply to your comment here, as a result of your recent posts calling them out for being violent tankies (proving you correct). Can we please defed? They’re just as bad as lemmygrad (who I came here to avoid) and last I checked you “didn’t think they were (all) tankies and would defed if they became a problem.” Can we at least admit they’re a problem now?

      • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        MLs can be allies when they act like anarchists

        Uh, sure, and Nazis can be allies if they act like communists. You ever wonder if the reason MLs keep shooting anarchists is because instead of trying to work together the anarchists just insist the MLs become anarchists?

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You ever wonder if the reason MLs keep shooting anarchists…

          gasp he said the silent part out loud!

    • punkisundead [they/them]@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think finding a way to find allys in all leftists would be worth it

      I am really fine working with all leftists when we go against nazis. When the goal is the same, the methods are the same or complement each other and they don’t try to take control of “my” space/group, I can work with MLs