Is it clear which works are considered canon and which ones are not?

    • SSTF@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not precisely that the old EU and canon overlap, but that the entire old EU has been thrown out. Within the fresh slate of new canon there are elements that are picked up and re-canonized, though they are changed to fit into the new canon.

      Classic EU characters, ships, planets, etc might appear but that doesn’t imply the old stories they are associated with are also canon.

        • SSTF@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I get what you’re saying now. I actually double checked myself and the buyout happened in 2012, but the erasure of the old EU happened after 2014.

          So there was slightly over two year period where Disney owned Star Wars with the old EU in place. A few books and things released then. Those few Disney released old EU stories were still turned into Legends like the rest of pre-Disney EU.

    • VarykOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Thank you

      Is this an explicit division of Canon?

      And none of the books have ever been considered Canon as far as you know?

      What is her is not part of the Star wars universe was never explicitly stated by Lucas or by Disney right?

      So is this general consensus by fans?

      • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think they missed the Disney shows which are of course canon.

        I’m in the minority here, but I consider Obi-wan especially to be primary canon, as necessary as Movies 1-6. They retconned in the emotional core of the whole damn saga with Obi-wan and fully realized Vader’s confrontation and resolution. That moment truly bridged the OT and prequels for me like nothing else had.

        • SSTF@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Disney’s stated policy is that there is no longer primary/secondary canon. There is (at least supposed to be) a storygroup working for Disney to ensure everything they make fits together because everything is equally canon.

          In practice, there have already been issues but that’s how it’s supposed to work.

        • VarykOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Good point, thanks. I’m surprised to hear that you’re in the minority for the Obi-Wan series being canon, Ewan McGregor is so Obi-Wan to me that I just assumed that show was cannon as well

          • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Im not in the minority of acknowledging it being canon, I’m in the minority calling it essential canon. A lot of people hated it for its B story that I personally thought was fine.

      • SSTF@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It is an explicit division made by Disney. They threw out everything in order to make room for their own stories. All of the old pre-2014 books are non-canon. Any books freshly released after 2014 would be canon.

        • VarykOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh that’s very interesting, thanks