• starman2112
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So given the choice between someone actively demanding genocide and someone who’s passively supporting a genocide, you’d sooner see more people murdered than vote for the lesser evil?

        • starman2112
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So you would sooner choose to let more people suffer than involve yourself in seeing fewer people suffer. What an awful person you are.

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            in the trolley thought experiment, I don’t pull the lever because I’m not a murderer

            • starman2112
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah you are. If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice. You don’t get to not involve yourself, not pulling the lever is as much an active choice to kill 5 people as pulling the lever is a choice to kill one.

              You value your own sense of self righteousness over the lives of other people, and that’s awful and selfish.

              • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                not pulling the lever is as much an active choice to kill 5 people as pulling the lever is a choice to kill one.

                that’s not what deontologists believe

                • starman2112
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I don’t care what deontologists believe. They value their own sense of self-righteousness and moral superiority over the lives of other people, and that’s evil. If you would rather see a woman raped than commit an act of violence against her rapist because committing violence is always wrong, you are evil. If you accept that there are situations where committing acts of violence aren’t necessarily wrong, you aren’t a deontologist and don’t get to use it as an excuse not to pull the lever.

              • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You value your own sense of self righteousness over the lives of other people, and that’s awful and selfish.

                and I’d say you value your own sense of power over the lives of the person you killed.

                • starman2112
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s totally incorrect. I value the lives of the people that aren’t going to die. Unlike you, I don’t make decisions based on how I personally feel about them, but rather what the outcome will be.

                  • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    if you think the ends justify the means, you should look into eugenics! very interesting stuff!