• Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They can win by making videos only accessible via account and aggressively banning adblock users. It will hurt it at first but people would rather accept it instead of finding a replacement. I expect this to happen in a few years.

      • xan1242@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Nothing can beat a VCR with an ad skipper.

        And I am not afraid to use it.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah. Which is pretty much undefeatable unless they get rid of the ability to skip sections of a video entirely and I don’t think there’ll be wanting to do that. Sponsor block doesn’t exactly block things, it just skips sections of a video that the community has submitted it’s not quite the same thing.

          Those sections might be intro animations, that bit where they go “hey guys my name is XYZ YouTuber smash that like button and don’t forget to subscribe comment and ring that bell!” etc

        • hansl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ads can be randomly placed so there is no specific timestamp to skip.

          This would obviously be very costly for Google, which is likely why they haven’t done it yet, but ultimately an ad blocker wouldn’t be able to block those.

          • Vincent Adultman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Don’t give them any ideas, a’right? But yeah. That’s true. We could skip those identifying per frame/time, but adblocking would need more resources.

    • xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Well, if googles web integrity api becomes reality, every site that makes money from ads will refuse to serve any modified client.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It doesn’t really matter they can’t implement it if the other browsers aren’t on board.

            So they haven’t so much backed out as much as they’ve been forced to give up with the idea because no one else wants to do it. Because why would you, it only benefits YouTube?

      • bangupjobasusual
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Twitch has the unique use case of live streaming, which makes the content’s timeliness a factor in the users experience.

      • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        How did twitch win? Would you not say that YouTube has a larger user base, and therefore a larger target of this sort of cracking?

    • Vilian@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      i’m nit seeing any ads using ublock origin, i doubt thst they are blocking anythibg except from worse adblocks

  • otp
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This has been my secret weapon for a long time.