• 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Can we all agree that people that send voice notes for no good reason are the worst?

    No I don’t want to find some time to sit through your 5 minute ramble.

    • DaMonsterKnees@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Forgive me, friend, but I am not familiar. You’re saying they send like… like… voice-mail? Fucking monsters.

      The text doesn’t do my sentiment credit. I, too, would hate those people. My boss does this. Hostages people in conversations. I don’t want to be your fucking soundboard for 47 minutes mate!

    • Hexagon@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Then imagine this: people who send bursts of extremely short voice messages, like 1 to 3 seconds. For anything

      • schmidtster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Some people also don’t like getting a wall of text, smaller text messages (think paragraph size) can be easier to scroll, digest and respond too.

        Sometimes it’s the same thought, sometimes it’s multiple. I’ve never had someone ask me to put multiple messages in one to make it easier to deal with. Usually want them broken down.

        • STUPIDVIPGUY@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’ve never sent a text more than a couple paragraphs but I would say that paragraph long messages are not considered short, it’s talking about the annoyance of when people send 12 different 5-word texts successively

      • shneancy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        add has nothing to do with your ability to not hit send every third word

        you can write it all out in one message, or a few messages if something new pops into your head, i promise

        • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think whoever is doing that is fucking with you.

          We can finish whole sentences, lots of them, we just get this anxiety that you won’t understand because our brains are broken, so we keep adding more to try and get our point across and then we realize we have sent too much, so then we have to explain that.

          It’s just a bunch of snowballing into a negative feedback loop after that, that’s when we stop all the texting and just try to figure out what the hell is wrong with us and how to fix it.

          But hey, hyper focus is almost a superpower!😁😞

  • DreamButt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly it depends on the context. If my good buddy is sending me their thoughts on a really bad piece of media then ya I want the stream of consciousness take. But if this is a random text from an acquaintance then it better be in as few chunks as possible

  • saltnotsugar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Hey.

    Saw your text.

    What time?

    Oh wait I see it.

    Hmmmm.

    (Gif of giraffe on roller skates)

    I think it’s okay.

    Maybe.

          • STUPIDVIPGUY@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            to answer your question, it’s just annoying to get 8 notifications when it can just be one

              • Fades@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                yes seriously, if you get a message - send an alert, after so many “rapid” messages (x amount of seconds, should be user configurable) the notifications stop and it instead monitors and after a certain time period then it gives you a notif “received x messages from y in the last z time units” if the messages haven’t yet been viewed.

                So easy, low hanging fruit, but oh well I guess

            • schmidtster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Isn’t it more annoying to get a wall of text? A couple extra notifications to make responding easier is the better option sometimes.

              Granted if it’s single sentences it’s different, but if it’s a few paragraphs, far easier to deal and respond in chunks.

              • Skua@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s a wall of text either way, one of them just has new texts where the other has new lines

              • STUPIDVIPGUY@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                just say what you need to say, thoughts all over the place make it harder to respond

                1 or 2 put together paragraphs is better than 12 different thoughts all thrown at you individually

                just a more understandable, more mature way of sharing information

    • XbSuper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My rule when someone does this, is to not respond for at least an hour. Doesn’t matter what they said, or how urgent the matter is (unless it’s a true emergency), 1 hour minimum.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What gets me is that most apps I’ve seen do not use the full screen width to display messages. On a phone, in portrait mode, the screen is small enough, but the apps only use about 75% of the screen width. when they could use more. THis makes walls of text/paragraphs even more difficult to read.

  • Waker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is me, I’m sorry

    My brother hates when I do it, he straight up mutes me on discord for a day or so if I do it hahaha Probably other people too… As someone said here, it’s probably my ADHD, never thought about it in that way but it does make sense.

    I’ve been trying to cut down on the amount I send though. Keeping things concise, as much as I can.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I honestly think this is a bit of a generational gap. I grew up in the 90s and remember when “PCS” phones (the kind that started the whole personal cellphone thing for the masses) did not have text messaging. Then, later, some did, others didn’t.

    Eventually, every phone and carrier supported SMS. IMO, that’s partly because they charged per message. Shortly after that, some carriers offered a friends and family texting plan, where you could set a small amount of phone numbers (I think 5 was common) that would be unlimited texting, everyone else you texted was some small amount per message.

    Pretty quickly that was followed with unlimited texting plans.

    Almost immediately after that long form texting, aka MMS was introduced, but it was problematic from day one… You could also send multimedia over MMS, like pictures… They were compressed to hell, but it worked… Sometimes.

    Everything went RCS and data driven chats after that.

    The key point I’m driving at is that early texting, aka SMS, was limited to a maximum of 160 characters, which might just be able to contain the jist of a sentence. If you grew up before sms became a thing, long form may suit you better than alternatives. If you grew up with SMS, you probably have a learned behavior that text based messages should be pretty short and to the point, so many small-ish messages are probably required.

    I am excited to see what happens with those that didn’t have to limit their messages to 160 characters, grow up.

    I’m more or less on the cusp of the technology. I was subscribed pretty early on in my youth, so I’m kind of both but also nether. Anyways…

  • Sombyr@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I text multiple paragraph texts back to back over and over again. I’m told even being that verbose I’m still completely incomprehensible most of the time.

    • STUPIDVIPGUY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      (assumption)

      ah you’re one of those people who speaks in an unintuitive manner because you think a big vocabulary is better

      but you have not considered that succinct and understandable is better

      • Sombyr@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s partially that, but I more use obscure definitions for words rather than their intuitive ones. The issue is I don’t know what the average person will understand.

        The bigger problem is probably that I’m super autistic and expect people to know what I’m thinking just because I know it. I write a thousand paragraphs clarifying useless details to try to be clear, and then somebody will be like “Okay, but you never even once mentioned what it is you’re talking about,” and I’ll be like “Oh, I assumed by the fact that I said I was excited and mentioned several things that don’t happen in real life that it was clear I was talking about a new game I was enjoying.”
        I never know what details are actually useful to clarify until somebody’s getting confused about one of them (or usually more like 50 of them.)

        • STUPIDVIPGUY@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I can relate a little bit. I was never that bad but I was kind of like that as a teenager and I am ever so slightly autistic, I think.

          Think of caveman. Why use many word when few do trick? Even if it doesn’t feel like your natural flow of consciousness, try to channel him, and simplify.