That’s a raw deal. I always thought a 1-10 pain scale was a dumb Idea. Pain is pretty subjective and someone who hasn’t experienced severe pain doesn’t really have a way to understand what constitutes a 10. (I would answer differently before and after my cycling accident for example) Personally I think that setting the scale as 1-10 where breaking a leg is a 6 (or something) would be more diagnostically relevant. I trust your judgement, although what you call a 4 would probably be most people’s 8.
To the 11 people who down voted this: you are idiots.
Hah I have 4 of my own and they are fucking feral, so good luck offsetting that, dorks!
Jiisusi Kristusi, taakku pussit taamatut pissuseqarput! Uanga russit dobby-at inkontinentimik pissusilersortartoq
The us has been fucked for a long time. Only people who grew up in a supremely fucked place would allow what we see today. This is just the latest manifestation of fucked. Free Luigi!
A self help group for people who struggle with solvent abuse.
Officially, like 1 or something. But because of the mountains to the south, I won’t see the sun until the 22nd. But polar night ended yesterday technically.
Nope, Scandinavia.
As far as I know only one of you has had the stones to do that…Free Luigi
Well I moved to the Arctic to be away from distractions
I spilled a glass of scrumpy on the keyboard and a, s, and d no longer work. So I have to use a keyboard with it.
Medical Biology because I’m educated in the field. Runner up would be chemistry. Or brewing, but the only university I know of that has brewing as a degree programme is Heriot watt university and I’m not interested in moving back to Edinburgh.
The guy looks like one of those Kraftwerk robots.
At least it won’t be as bad as 2026.
A month ago or there abouts, someone posted the statistical breakdown of voting in the last election to Reddit. In the swing states (only the swing states) there was a larger than normal number of ballots where the only thing voted on was the presidential election (Ie not senate or local things). He proposed that Elon had used data from his lottery to select people who he thought were in it for the money and wouldn’t actually vote and voted on their behalf. He made quite a compelling argument.