• 3 Posts
  • 46 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 6th, 2023

help-circle
  • TheMetaleektoFrance@jlai.luJ'ai un peu honte, mais...
    link
    fedilink
    Français
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    12 days ago

    J’ai réalisé seulement après mes 20 ans que “euro” c’était parce que c’était la monnaie de l’Europe… Mais le must c’était quand même au collège, j’ai dévoré les livres Harry Potter, sans avoir lu les films, et quand j’en parlais je prononçais Ron comme le mot “rond”, jusqu’à tomber honteusement tard sur quelqu’un qui m’a pointé la prononciation normale





  • TheMetaleekOPtoRed Dead@lemmy.worldProblems Running RDR2 PC
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Hello again! I finally succeeded to make it work in a satisfying way. The key issue was indeed an adapter output problem, BUT for some reason rdr2 kept saying that the integrated graohics had more vram than the dedicated gpu, and switched to it even though I forced it. On top of that the vsync for some reason capped the fps at 30, weirdly.

    Anyway, thanks again for taking the time to answer me and suggest all those things, you really were a light in the dark in all this troubleshooting!



  • TheMetaleekOPtoRed Dead@lemmy.worldProblems Running RDR2 PC
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Thank you again for your time! The output adapter is set to 1, the Nvidia GPU. As for DirectX, it starts with an error telling me to update drivers, even though I ensured they all were set to the latest version… If you have any other questions, or idea, I’m up for it!


  • TheMetaleekOPtoRed Dead@lemmy.worldProblems Running RDR2 PC
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Thanks for answering! I kept my laptop plugged in, and as for other games I was able to run Helldivers 2 or Sea of Thieves both absolutely maxed out on 1080p with more than 100 fps.

    This is why I asked here, it really seems there’s a specific issue with rdr2 that I can’t seem to figure out




  • TheMetaleektoScience@mander.xyz*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Maybe, just maybe, if editors did a hint of work with all the money they steal from public science funding, we could stabilise the system towards more integrity and less quantity of publication. Or also just get rid of editors to obtain the same result, but this is sadly utopic today. Peer reviewing is not the problem, and probably still is the best way to assess research quality. However, tendency towards quantity over quality, and applied research over fundamental are what skews the process and its results


  • TheMetaleektoAsklemmy@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 months ago

    As others have stated, water in trees gets up thanks to two processes. The first is indeed capillary action. The tubes carrying the water are rather thin, and it clings to the sides of it. But this is a rather small part of the total energy carrying the water. The main mechanism is a negative pressure inside the vascular system of the tree. Basically, tree leaves sweat water all the time (more or less depending on temperature). The water leaving the tree kind of sucks up the water following inside the vessels (this is a simplification to not go into the physics behind). In some larger trees, the negative pressure inside the vascular system can be exceptionally strong, requiring exceptional strength of the tree’s components.













Moderates