In this context, successful - wealthy enough to own a house, or maybe a few.
In this context, successful - wealthy enough to own a house, or maybe a few.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
That problem would quickly be solved if humanity had to.
…and if humanity existed
Yeah sure, it’s much more easy to colonize Mars than to do something about the Earth.
Nooo, how could that be. It’s the fault of the successful wealthy people who refuse to share their stuff for free with complete strangers.
The scarcity is artificial.
Artificial in a way that people don’t want to give their houses for free to a complete strangers?
Yeah, scarcity is created artificially by people who don’t want to give their stuff for free to complete strangers.
Removed by mod
Justification is needed for action, not inaction. I don’t need a reason to do nothing.
REDUSTRIBUUUUTE
Mlyntsi
Why should we?
Wow, I didn’t like billionaires very much, but if the alternative is a global revolution, then I guess I can put up with billionaires.
If not everyone needs to work, then who needs it? Why should you work while others don’t?
Blows my mind how you operate under the notion that we should give houses to homeless people.
ideological drivers are disingenuous self interest on deciding what parts of the state they want to keep
Which parts of the state they want to keep that’s beneficial to them, but detrimental to you?
Removed by mod
How do you give up a house without loosing too much? Are you a billionaire or something?