What is the standard for counting the active user? As a lurker, I don’t think I would be counted.

Thanks, but sadly I think there are no real men/women near me.

I wish I were able to achieve even 0.01% of this, I am just born unable.

Some of my critical apps depend on android/iOS, guess I am screwed

I don’t think this strategy is working.

I agree about everything else, but I thoght lemmy people were mostly employed (usually in tech sector), and are in their 30s~40s.

Would unfettered inheritance finally be gone for good?

People know about what non-Euclidean means? Wow, do they also know about manifolds?

I have similar question: Why did Samsung bother with developing foldable phones? It isn’t selling as well as they thought, after all.

deleted by creator

Why is this so low in the comment section

Dang it, my streak was going well till this

IIRC, for this kind of guarantee, you need a CCA(Chosen-ciphertext attack)-security. I dunno if this scheme satisfies such a security.

My gosh, what is with people’s reliance on single thing

My exact thought reading the comic, young ppl would not like that.

At least it’s not going to be the overhyped LLM doing the analysis, it seems, considering the input is a photo data.

It might still be possible to compare ciphertexts and extract information from there, right? Welp I am not sure if the whole scheme is secure against related attacks.

I have an iPad, now I am scared… Should I do something about this?

Yes, paraphene candle reflects light, unless you won’t know that it’s white

I believe individuals choose the worldview that comforts/benefits one the most, and that is why programmers often think in discrete units. It helps them identify issues and handle them well. Is there a reason to introduce discomfort, when the worldview works quite well?