• sanpedropeddler
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    8 months ago

    Sucks for the dolphin but I’m not sure why everyone cares so much. There are real murders happening.

      • sanpedropeddler
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        8 months ago

        Its not that I don’t “understand” I just disagree. I do not value animal lives as much as human lives which is why I’m not referring to this as a real murder. This is sad of course and whoever did it deserves to be punished for it. Its just odd to me that this is such a big deal to so many people when so many human beings are being murdered on a daily basis. The reaction I’ve seen to this outweighs that of any human murder I’ve seen in recent memory.

        • xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          When a cute and innocent individual get brutally murdered, people get sad. When it’s some guy in sub-Saharan Africa, that you hear similar reports of every day, it’s just not evoking much of a response. Probably that is what is going on.

          Also, there are fewer dolphins than there are humans. From that perspective, it is even sadder.

          I don’t agree that humans are special in any way, btw.

          • sanpedropeddler
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            8 months ago

            I agree this is probably caused by reports of human murder being so common. Eventually you get desensitized to tragedy when you see it enough. Maybe this was just different enough from the norm that it got that emotional response.

            I don’t understand how you can think humans aren’t special in any way. They are the most special animal I can think of. I can understand if you value animal lives more than I do. That’s pretty subjective, although I think most people value human lives much more than animal lives.

            • xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              There is this concept of ‘Us and them’, a in group and out group. In conflict it is often utilized to make your guys hate the other group and ‘dehumanize’ them so that you can prevent your guys directing sympathy towards the enemy. The other guys may have different language and culture and whatnot. Language is one of the best barriers for sympathy and is well recognized by the ones that use this to their advantage.

              To a large extent, I think it is the same principles that prevent people from recognizing the suffering of individuals of other species.

              We apply importance to the recognition of suffering so we can prevent it. I say we apply it to everyone.

              Now, of course we can nit-pick and try to separate out who or what we apply sympathy to. You could designate some things as just automatons; such as ants, bacteria or even viruses. But I’m not gonna do that now.

              • silasmariner@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                I think the individual tragedy of every death that happens hitting you would be a tornado that ripped you from your sanity and sent your soaring. Some say that’s what happened to God. But we’re not gods, we’re small people with small lives, and it’s easy to connect the death of a dolphin by gunfire to the death of the world by overconsumption, even if only metaphorically. It’s a tragedy because of everything that it is, not because of the one cute dolphin. Although that is also sad.

              • sanpedropeddler
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                8 months ago

                I believe emotion is the basis for morality, and there is no objective morality. I have little emotional reaction to an ant dying. I have some emotional reaction to a dolphin dying. I have a great emotional reaction to a human dying. Your emotional reactions to these things are different from mine. That’s where the conversation ends for me.

                I could make up an explanation like yours to explain why I feel this way, but the truth is that I just feel this way. I believe that’s also the real explanation for why you feel the way you do. I doubt you really logic and reasoned your way into caring for humans and animals equally.

            • Willy
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              I’ve never met a dolphin I didn’t like, not that I really got to know them. people on the other hand.…

              I think that’s what this is.

        • prole
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Great point. It’s really too bad that humans evolved to only be able to consider one thing at a time, and therefore nobody can care about the murder of a dolphin AND the deaths of humans.

          Fucking bummer. But I guess we’re limited by our biology.

          • ripcord@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            On the plus side, considering this means I don’t care about what they were saying now!