• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -32 months ago

    Not just the US. Chechnya was invaded by Russia. German civilians were bombed by the UK and USSR.

    In fact, it’s hard to find a large-scale modern war that didn’t cause thousands of civilian casualties.

    • Pennomi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 months ago

      Absolutely, there were millions of civilian casualties in WWII. The difference here is that there have been, according to Israel, only 273 soldiers killed in ground operation combat vs the 13,000 civilians killed on Gaza’s side. (According to the new, lower estimates.) This is not so much a war as a one-sided beatdown.

      • DarkGamer
        link
        fedilink
        02 months ago

        Are you really suggesting that every asymmetrical war that is conducted successfully is genocide? O.o

        • Pennomi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 months ago

          No, I’m saying that if a nation has such a huge advantage they also have more responsibility to select targets carefully so as to not kill noncombatants.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -1
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            A nation taking lots of casualties has the same responsibilities as one taking few casualties.

            That said, the proportion of civilian casualties to the total population of Gaza is comparable to that of Chechnya and less than in Vietnam, North Korea or the East Front of WW2. Unfortunately, civilian casualties are an inevitable part of modern war.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -3
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I mean, there isn’t any obligation in war to make sure casualties are evenly distributed among both sides.

        Normally, a lopsided war ends only when the losing side surrenders.