While Ezra was taking a nap in his crib, the family’s Husky that they owned for eight years attacked out of nowhere.

“And to just bring awareness that it could be any dog at any time. Completely unprovoked, no matter what the history is,” Chloe said.

  • the_crotch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t. Instincts are a reason. If it was following its instincts, it didn’t attack for no reason.

    • Varyk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      So it’s more like a semantics(what words mean) thing tripping you up.

      Got it.

      If you stand on your head, then pyramids look like ice cream cones.

      Totally.

      • the_crotch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        “there was no reason, but here’s the reason” isn’t semantics. It’s just you contradicting yourself one sentence later.

        • Varyk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yes, semantics, I get it.

          You need things strictly defined for you but aren’t willing to provide parameters or ask questions.

          You built a sand castle and then knocked it down all by yourself.

          Very impressive.

          • the_crotch
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Saying two conflicting things in the same statement isn’t semantics. It’s evidence that the author is a putz.

            • intensely_human@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Whether two statements conflict with one another is a function of what those statements mean which is also called “semantics”.

            • Varyk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              4 months ago

              Oh, so you’re interpreting certain words to mean something different than their intention?

              Like your choosing to define a word differently than someone else?

              Isn’t there a…word…for that…

              Oh, semantics, got it, good thing you connected the dots there.

              • the_crotch
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                Like your choosing to define a word differently than someone else?

                No? I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt, assuming you know English, and interpreting them as written. There’s not a whole lot of room for interpretation there.

                Though I am starting to wonder if maybe I gave you too much credit

                • Varyk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  If you don’t understand that one word can have multiple definitions, I’ll agree that your assumptions may be giving you trouble.

                  • the_crotch
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    I assure you, the word “no” does not have any other meanings.