The term originally characterized farmers that had a red neck, caused by sunburn from long hours working in the fields. A citation from 1893 provides a definition as “poorer inhabitants of the rural districts … men who work in the field, as a matter of course, generally have their skin stained red and burnt by the sun, and especially is this true of the back of their necks”.[12] Hats were usually worn and they protected that wearer’s head from the sun, but also provided psychological protection by shading the face from close scrutiny.[13] The back of the neck however was more exposed to the sun and allowed closer scrutiny about the person’s background in the same way callused working hands could not be easily covered.

By 1900, “rednecks” was in common use to designate the political factions inside the Democratic Party comprising poor white farmers in the South.[14] The same group was also often called the “wool hat boys” (for they opposed the rich men, who wore expensive silk hats). A newspaper notice in Mississippi in August 1891 called on rednecks to rally at the polls at the upcoming primary election:[15]

  • Ogmios
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    The entire reason it became an insult was because of wealthy urbanites disparaging the working class.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        You just reminded me of that news blooper.

        “I so pale…” “you’re on…” first news reporter starts the news report as if nothing happened, while the second one stiffles giggles

        I swear they both give of a Pam Beasley vibe. So two Pams, and they have a Pam/Jim vibe with each other, and one is “so pale”.

    • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 months ago

      Did you know the invention of lawns was also a way to flaunt that you were wealthy enough to have unfarmed land?

      • edric@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I hate lawns so much, but there’s no other option unless you go for a townhouse/condo, which are more expensive in my area because of the great location. Why would anyone want to use and pay for extra water, then mow and trim every other week, for a patch of grass that doesn’t provide any benefit as a plant.

        • azertyfun
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Uh, they originally weren’t paid. They were paid for.