A police officer has been filmed kicking and stamping on the head of a man lying on the ground at Manchester Airport.

The uniformed male officer is seen holding a Taser over the man, who is lying face down, before striking him twice while other officers shout at onlookers to stay back in a video shared widely online.

Greater Manchester Police (GMP) said firearms officers had been attacked while attempting to arrest someone following a fight in the airport’s Terminal 2 on Tuesday. It said it had referred itself to the police watchdog.

Anger has grown over the video and a crowd of what appeared to be several hundred people protested outside the police station in Rochdale, Greater Manchester, on Wednesday evening.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    462 months ago

    When she grabs the pot of boiling water, one deputy steps back “away from your hot steaming water,” he says.

    “I rebuke you in the name of Jesus,” she says in response.

    “Huh?” the deputy says.

    “I rebuke you in the name of Jesus,” she repeats.

    “You better fking not or I swear to God I’ll fking shoot you in the f**king face,” Grayson says to her.

    Does it? Is a rebuking a threat with a weapon? Why doesn’t the militaries just have shoot if you’re scared rules but USA police do?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 months ago

      As to your last sentence…because Leavenworth. Soldiers have real rules to follow and if you fuck up it goes from bad to worse for you real quick. Granted the military has its own issues but these pigs took our hand me down MRAPs and none of the ROE.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      Does it? Is a rebuking a threat with a weapon? Why doesn’t the militaries just have shoot if you’re scared rules but USA police do?

      You are starting to get that slippery slope thing. If you give humans power for some purpose, the purpose is washed away after some time, but the power isn’t, and it forms its own interests.

      Police casually killing civilians still fulfills the interest of keeping the existing order. Cause somebody has given to the state that “monopoly on violence” thing.

      And it’s interesting how other barbaric rules, like “insulting the king gets your tongue cut out”, or “touching royalty gets your hand hewed off”, or “not bowing in time gets you beheaded”, have been abolished, but “the king can kill you any time, but since you are his property, he’ll also kill outsiders trying to hurt you” still persists.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -472 months ago

      I don’t know if your last sentence was put together enough to be understandable.

      Again, I think if a person was 5/6 feet away from a military man with loaded gun, and they threatened the military man, and he raised his weapon and threatened to shoot them if they attempt to throw the boiling water in them… Yeah, I think they would have equally protected themselves.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        232 months ago

        Rebuking is not a threat. You and the cop do not know what rebuke means.

        He overreacted to a word which means “I’m disapproving strongly.”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -242 months ago

          I was more referring to the ignoring the cops requests as she walked over and picked up a pot of boiling water . . But most importantly, the part where she reaches up for the pot, after being warned at gunpoint that the cops feel unsafe.

          She reached up for the pot…

          I don’t think her race is responsible for her reaching up for that pot. But that might just be me.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            172 months ago

            The cop literally noticed the pot and told her to go move it because he didn’t want to deal with a fire when he was there.

            She didn’t go to it until she was told to go move it off the flame.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -92 months ago

                  And she does so… And then she gets down on the floor… All of that seems good. It’s the part where she reaches back up for the water from the floor, whilst staring directly at the cio that just warned her she would be shit if she tried to harm them

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            142 months ago

            Who is responsible for the complete mismatch between your description and the events if the video?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                122 months ago

                You said she threatened the cops, which never happened. She was shot after she let go of the pot, which the police had told her to take care of in the first place!

                This asshole was looking for an excuse to murder someone, and you’re bending over backwards to give it to him. Shame on you, and I hope you run into a cop having a bad day.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    112 months ago

                    Reached up for the pot? So you acknowledge she wasn’t holding it then. It’s not like it was a gun, you’d have plenty of warning if she attempted to do something crazy with it (which is not at all clear from the video that she would have).

                    What do you get out of trolling like this?

          • @UrPartnerInCrime
            link
            English
            12 months ago

            Why is any cop playing judge, jury, an executioner?

            Even if she was to throw boiling water his way, which she was clearly trying to protect her head when the gun came up, it doesn’t warrent deadly force. Yes the cop would be in pain and scarred, but that’s the threat he signed up for being an officer.

            Anytime the police kill someone it’s a gross overstep of power regardless of race, age, mental capacity, drug use, financial situation, or any other box you want to put a victim in. You can make a case for if there’s actual shots fired at the officers, but still a cops job is to bring people in so that can properly pay for their crimes.

            So, again, even if she was about to throw that water 6+ feet over a counter to hurt him, that officer grossly misjudged the situation and made himself look like the biggest coward by not only drawing his gun but firing.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -132 months ago

              Are you saying the cop would have taken the water on the face if the person was white?