ModerateImprovement to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-26 个月前US Court Rules Google a Monopoly in 'Biggest Antitrust Case of the 21st Century'.www.commondreams.orgexternal-linkmessage-square222fedilinkarrow-up11.26Karrow-down19file-text
arrow-up11.25Karrow-down1external-linkUS Court Rules Google a Monopoly in 'Biggest Antitrust Case of the 21st Century'.www.commondreams.orgModerateImprovement to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-26 个月前message-square222fedilinkfile-text
Voice Of America: Google loses massive antitrust case over its search dominance. The Conversation: A US Court has ruled Google is an illegal monopoly – and the internet might never be the same.
minus-squarePikalinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up64arrow-down2·edit-26 个月前Oh boy, can’t wait for this one to be thrown out by our totally not rigged, definitly for the people supreme Court.
minus-squareFedizen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up38·6 个月前Clarence Thomas needs a new RV, which one will google buy him?
minus-squareGood_morning@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·6 个月前Throw in a 4 wheeler and you’ve got a deal
minus-squareBobGnarley@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 个月前Shit, Google would probably offer a private jet fuck an RV.
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 个月前Clarence isn’t smart enough for that.
minus-squarewerefreeatlast@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·6 个月前The supremes will rule fairly! …and in the case of people vs the Google, how do you find these 3 million dollars in a quad motor Tesla? Innocent your supremacist! Innocent!
minus-squarePatch@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-26 个月前What with Trump recently declaring (in his usual completely coherent and not at all deranged manner) that Google Are Bad, the Supreme Court might not necessarily be feeling so keen to help out on this one.
minus-squarebitwolf@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 个月前Trump is mad at Google so the Republicans want it. So Supreme Court will likely rule 6/3 in favor.
Oh boy, can’t wait for this one to be thrown out by our totally not rigged, definitly for the people supreme Court.
Clarence Thomas needs a new RV, which one will google buy him?
Throw in a 4 wheeler and you’ve got a deal
Shit, Google would probably offer a private jet fuck an RV.
Clarence isn’t smart enough for that.
The supremes will rule fairly! …and in the case of people vs the Google, how do you find these 3 million dollars in a quad motor Tesla?
Innocent your supremacist! Innocent!
What with Trump recently declaring (in his usual completely coherent and not at all deranged manner) that Google Are Bad, the Supreme Court might not necessarily be feeling so keen to help out on this one.
Trump is mad at Google so the Republicans want it. So Supreme Court will likely rule 6/3 in favor.
one can hope lol