You’ve got to let the police do their jobs, number one. Number two, you have to do a policy of stop and frisk. When you see a guy coming down the street and you can — the police know every one of them. They know their middle name. They know where they live. They know every one of them, the local police, and they’re great.

You got to let them do their job, stop and frisk, and take their gun away. You’ve got to do it. If somebody has because they have all these guns — you know, it’s very interesting, the toughest gun law, the toughest, by far, in the whole United States is in Chicago, and yet it’s the most — it’s —

Let all your Republican 2Aer friends and family know.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Oh yeah it’s going to make him real popular with the second amendment people. LoL

      I think it’ll be hilarious if Kamala Harris released a statement saying that unlike Trump she will never take your guns away. 🤣

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        They have turned their brains off, if they were ever on in the first place. Back when I was on reddit I was arguing with so-called “libertarians” who claimed Donald would protect their gun rights. Of course I was banned because they are actually Repubs cosplaying as libertarians. Banning me was a violation of the NAP, BTW.

        • Voroxpete
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          They absolutely did care. He had to walk it back. It created a lot of consternation from the alt-right and hardcore libertarian types.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            They acted like they cared for 3 fucking seconds.

            Please, my memory isn’t that bad. I was there, “walk it back” is not how I would describe it.

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s not correct. It was from 2018, after the Stoneman Douglas shooting.

          Not sure how the timing makes it any less of an obvious attack on Second Amendment rights. But I’ve seen MAGAs find weaker or more fictitious excuses to support worse positions, so I have no doubt you’ve seen them excusing this thing with that reason also.

          https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-take-firearms-first/

      • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Oh yeah it’s going to make him real popular with the second amendment people. LoL

        98% of them are completely unaware of this or know he’s only go after the other people and never theirs

        I think it’ll be hilarious if Kamala Harris released a statement saying that unlike Trump she will never take your guns away.

        While that would be a nice sting to the other side, that would alienate part of her base who are all for gun laws.

        • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          You can be pro gun law and still say “We aren’t going to take your guns.” Gun laws don’t prevent gun ownership and don’t enable confiscation of guns from lawful owners. They simply ensure that mentally unstable people or those with criminal backgrounds cannot buy one legally.