@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 14 days agoIntel cans 20A process nodewww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up113arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up112arrow-down1external-linkIntel cans 20A process nodewww.theregister.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 14 days agomessage-square4fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink10•14 days agoyes angstrom. we are st the age of fab nodes where nm isnt precise enough measurmenet under 3nm
minus-squareAdmiral PatricklinkfedilinkEnglish4•14 days agoThanks. That’s what I thought but guess I couldn’t believe we were there. Last I really read (which has been a while), below 3nm, quantum tunneling became a problem. I guess we’ve addressed that in the fab process.
minus-squareScratchlinkEnglish7•14 days agoRemember that the reported nm resolution is kinda arbitrary and laced with marketing wank.
yes angstrom. we are st the age of fab nodes where nm isnt precise enough measurmenet under 3nm
Thanks. That’s what I thought but guess I couldn’t believe we were there. Last I really read (which has been a while), below 3nm, quantum tunneling became a problem. I guess we’ve addressed that in the fab process.
Remember that the reported nm resolution is kinda arbitrary and laced with marketing wank.