@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 14 days agoIntel cans 20A process nodewww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up113arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up112arrow-down1external-linkIntel cans 20A process nodewww.theregister.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 14 days agomessage-square4fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareAdmiral PatricklinkfedilinkEnglish4•13 days agoThanks. That’s what I thought but guess I couldn’t believe we were there. Last I really read (which has been a while), below 3nm, quantum tunneling became a problem. I guess we’ve addressed that in the fab process.
minus-squareScratchlinkEnglish7•13 days agoRemember that the reported nm resolution is kinda arbitrary and laced with marketing wank.
Thanks. That’s what I thought but guess I couldn’t believe we were there. Last I really read (which has been a while), below 3nm, quantum tunneling became a problem. I guess we’ve addressed that in the fab process.
Remember that the reported nm resolution is kinda arbitrary and laced with marketing wank.