• otp
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    These are not used to kill people…

    • conciselyverbose
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you actually “lock people in a closed phone booth sized space until the smoke is gone”, you are absolutely taking a significant risk of someone dying. You need airflow to replace oxygen in a space that small.

      • otp
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Given that it’s a hospital, I doubt that they’d be using anything that’s likely to kill someone.

        • conciselyverbose
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          Read what he’s describing. He’s basically saying “fuck smokers, they get what they get”. “Fuck smokers” is fine, but if you’re deliberately trying to trap them in a tiny, contained room that you’re not circulating air through, they will be deprived of oxygen.

          • otp
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            You’ll have a hard time convincing me that his plan is to kill anyone who smokes in his hospital.

            Not only does it go against the whole point of a hospital, it’s probably very illegal for him to kill anyone that way, and I wouldn’t be surprised if some of his top staff are smokers. Not to mention that there’d have to be multiple people in on it during the installation and usage.

            • conciselyverbose
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              You can’t make them breathe all their smoke in if there’s sufficient air circulation.

              What he’s describing can’t not result in decreased access to oxygen.

              • otp
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I think you might be taking his words too literally

                • conciselyverbose
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  What he’s advocating is deranged so he must be joking?

                  He said what he said.

                  • otp
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    What he’s advocating is his literal words are sound deranged so he must be joking speaking figuratively?

                    Yeah, that’s usually how that works.