A federal rule banning fake online reviews is now in effect.

The Federal Trade Commission issued the rulein August banning the sale or purchase of online reviews. The rule, which went into effect Monday, allows the agency to seek civil penalties against those who knowingly violate it.

“Fake reviews not only waste people’s time and money, but also pollute the marketplace and divert business away from honest competitors,” FTC Chair Lina Khan said about the rule in August. She added that the rule will “protect Americans from getting cheated, put businesses that unlawfully game the system on notice, and promote markets that are fair, honest, and competitive.”

  • Ogmios
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    30 days ago

    I’m sure this will work.

      • mindaika@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        30 days ago

        Agreed.

        Insofar as the Lord doesn’t actually do anything, but millions continue to fawn over him because he said maybe someday eventually he might

      • ayyy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 days ago

        Hmm, the same Lord that created all the fake reviews in the first place?

    • Ledivin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      30 days ago

      You’re right, we should just leave it as being legal 🙄 that’s so much better

      • andrewta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        30 days ago

        Why do people do what you just did?

        He says this won’t work.

        And somehow you jump to “then we should just leave it as being legal”

        He didn’t say we shouldn’t try something just that this might not be the best implementation.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          30 days ago

          He didn’t say we shouldn’t try something just that this might not be the best implementation.

          He didn’t really say anything, you’re just hypothesizing a substantive argument from a low effort pessimistic gripe.

          • andrewta@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            29 days ago

            No. The other guy is basically claiming something that has no basis in fact. And I’m trying to figure out why people do that.