Since the election I’ve kinda buried my head in the sand to try and stay sane, so I’m not sure what projections are looking like for the real estate market. Unfortunately I need to move pretty ASAP and I’m having the worst luck with rentals.

So, anyone have any advice or an idea of the outlook in the next few months?

  • dream_weasel
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well that’s a super nuanced answer though.

    IF OP can afford a house AND can keep enough emergency savings to deal with an issue, it may still be better to buy. Rental money is just gone forever in exchange for not assuming any risk on the property, but it retains no value.

    If OP can’t afford to buy at all, this post is stupid, so the question is really if there’s no money left for emergencies. In which case, the obvious answer is keep renting because a single point of failure pushing you out of your house is a bad proposition.

    If there’s SOME money… It just depends on the house. Some of the failure points are covered by inspection, but it could be risky. Better to not max out your ability to borrow if at all possible.

    • passiveaggressivesonar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      First few years are spent in interest so it’s also going straight to the bank

      Equity is uncertain in this market, especially with unexpected maintenance

      Rent comfortably for a few years is still the better choice, buying a house now that might fall in price is a terrible risk

      • dream_weasel
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Depends how much money you have an the mortgage length you pick. Every payment covers some principle and some interest. There is no situation where you get a house and then just pay interest. This is a lack of understanding of how payments work.

        • passiveaggressivesonar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          The first few years are overwhelmingly paid towards interest and not the principal, it’s not an equal ratio throughout the mortgage. I think you missed some fine print

          If you get into a mortgage then sell in 2 years you would have paid off less than 2 years worth of payments to the principal and you’re not getting that money back, that’s straight to the bank

          • dream_weasel
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            “The first few years go to interest” and “the first few years are overwhelmingly paid toward interest” are not the same thing. The shorter the term, the smaller the total amount of interest paid is (and often the better the rates), and the more principal only payments you can make the lesser the interest paid.

            Of course interest fraction is different by payment, but it’s not as though the first payments you make are a lost cause: mortgage payments are always contributing to your ownership, rent payments never are. It’s only a question of liquidity in the moment. Depending on the OPs situation rent could be more than a mortgage payment, in which case I know which I’d rather pay (as long as I could afford the insurance) if I wasnt planning to move right away.