• stevedice
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    You can’t be against feature creep and for add-ons. Those two are entirely antithetical.

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Sure you can, because those are two different things. Feature creep applies to functionality that is there straight out the box. Add-ons are things that are built ontop of the out the box solution.

      To put it in hardware, if you buy a PC then a PC is what you get out the box. If every PC had to come with a dedicated graphics card that would be a PC feature creep, because every PC doesn’t need a dedicated graphics card. However, that doesn’t mean you want mobo manufacturers to remove the PCIe slot, because you might want to add on (pun intended) a graphic card.

      Just because I think something shouldn’t be in the baseline for everyone doesn’t mean I also don’t want to those things to be available for the people who do want those things in their system

    • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Not at all. OS should just be core functionality, all bells and whistles should be add-ons so they can be added, replaced, or done without if not needed.

      • stevedice
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        That really depends on where you draw the line on what is “core functionality”. I’d consider a system tray to be core functionality, you apparently don’t.