• enkers
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    You’re correct! I had an extra not in there. Good catch.

    • ewigkaiwelo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I was actually referring to the other “not” that was at the end, but it only shows why it is paradoxical and how confusing nature of predication is in languages, as in this question appears to be a case of Russell’s paradox of sets

      • enkers
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Just a good reason not to dabble in paradoxes before you’ve had some coffee. lol