• enkers
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    There’s actually a whole class of these words. They’re called heterological words.

    Their opposite, autological (or homological) words are words that do describe themselves. “Autological” is an autological word because it describes itself.

    Here’s a fun question, though: is “heterological” a heterological word? If you say yes, then that means it does not describe itself and therefore it is not heterological. If you say no, then it does describe itself therefore it is heterological. Bit of a head scratcher.

    This is the Grelling-Nelson paradox.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      the new administration has banned the use of homological words so be careful.

    • ewigkaiwelo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Isn’t there a mistake in your first statement about the word heterological? If I say yes the word heterological is heterological it means that it doesn’t fall into the class of words that it describes and so it is heterological, because as you’ve defined heterological words do not describe themselves

      Here’s a fun question, though: is “heterological” a heterological word? If you say yes, then that means it does not describe itself and therefore it is not heterological.

      • enkers
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        You’re correct! I had an extra not in there. Good catch.

        • ewigkaiwelo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 minutes ago

          I was actually referring to the other “not” that was at the end, but it only shows why it is paradoxical and how confusing nature of predication is in languages, as in this question appears to be a case of Russell’s paradox of sets

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      My favorite homological word:

      Sesquipedalian.

      An unnecessarily long word, or a person who uses unnecessarily long words.

      Sesquipedalian is a sesquipedalian word.

      • enkers
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Oooh, that’s a good one! Its use also makes its user described by itself. Neat!

  • Pregnenolone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The hyphen has long been killed by the Internet. It suffered a worse fate than “literally”; it faded into nothingness without even so much as a “where is it?”

    • Vespair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This seems to apply to a number of speech impediments, as “rhotacism” is the term for people with difficulty saying R sounds and apparently “stutter” is a particularly difficult word for people with stutters.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      hyphenated words are on their way out. not much use for the hyphen in most cases.