• UrPartnerInCrime
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Bro my whole arguemt. Since the fuckign beginning has been don’t give kids drugs until we allow adults to have drugs. That includes puberty blockers

    Which since talking to other people I leavened of CPP but that’s literally health problems so it’s deffrnrt.

    But, your making up stuff and trying to mold the arguem t so your right.

    Ans lastly cause you wanna add it in, yeah I am against circumcision. But keep changing the argument

    • trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Bro my whole arguemt. Since the fuckign beginning has been don’t give kids drugs until we allow adults to have drugs. That includes puberty blockers

      RIP little Timmy, he could have lived with chemo but [email protected] doesn’t want children to take drugs.

      • UrPartnerInCrime
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        So I don’t ad life altering drugs one time and you pounce on it? There’s obviously a diffrnence between life altering and life saving drugs. Way to take one except out of context.

        Gross

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Bro my whole arguemt. Since the fuckign beginning has been don’t give kids drugs until we allow adults to have drugs. That includes puberty blockers

      So no healthcare for children, got it. No operations for fat boys with moobs, no circumcisions and since you phrase it that way, guess no medication for any other illnesses either, huh? And the reason for this asinine take is the view that you think that children can simply go to a doctors and command them to give them full gender reassignments.

      Your ignorance has been the issue the whole time. You’re afraid of a problem which doesn’t exist and because of that you want to make life miserable for those you pretend you’re looking out for. It’s horrific, tbh.

      “Making up stuff.” Name one.

      And now you’re spamming typos on purpose to even further pretend like you never edited anything to add anything to your comment, despite there being “edit” and “edit edit” and several sentences with those. Who do you think you’re lying to?

      • UrPartnerInCrime
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Making stuff up?

        you added 17 edits and made your arguemt 600% longer <–Lie your argument changed completely <-- Lie

        And I show you how I normally type cause I got big fingers and toye fast and I get in trouble. I go back to fix errors and get in trouble. There’s no winnignwith you

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          No, it’s not a lie. It’s a very clear comical exaggeration for humouristic purposes, because there’s SEVERAL “edit” labels you’ve added to the original, which everyone can see.

          I added the ‘edits’ immediately after I posted. Went back after starting to argue with you cause I realized I made some grammatical errors cause I went back to reread what I wrote.

          You added them 20 minutes later. I replied to you 10 minutes later.

          You added several sentences. You didn’t just “fix typos”.

          I also fixed typos after proofreading. Takes a whole of twenty seconds as you can see.

          • UrPartnerInCrime
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            No. There are 3 edits inadded. Not seventeen. I added all my thoughts immediately. And came back to clarify and fix typos after cause I knew it was a controversial top comment. Especially since it was getting traction immediately.

            Congrats on being better technically. Want and award?

            • Dasus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              No. There are 3 edits inadded. Not seventeen.

              #No, it’s not a lie. It’s a very clear comical exaggeration for humouristic purposes, because there’s SEVERAL “edit” labels you’ve added to the original, which everyone can see.

              Hope you can see that better now than in the previous comment.

              I added all my thoughts immediately.

              Not before I had already replied to you.

              • UrPartnerInCrime
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Idk what to tell you. Maybe you already had the threads loaded. Maybe my client needed an extra minute to update right there. I went back to my comment immediately after to add the edit and edit edit.

                Do you want me to be more sketch next time and not even try to add that I edited my comment. Or maybe next tiem I’ll add timestamps of when I edit every single word or sentence. But you’re taking this way too far.

                My original common, which minimally changed to clarify my messups, didn’t have anything to do with surgery’s, talked about my wanting a bigger dick, and stated people should be able tonexpress how they feel just no life altering drugs.

                Even what I added after doesn’t change what inworte. Even though I added them immediately

                • Dasus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  I do know what to tell you.

                  You wrote a comment, I read it, replied it to it, and whilst I was replying to it, you started editing it, then I posted my comment and then you posted your edit.

                  Nothing weird about it. And still, you don’t say you suffered from moobs, do you? So how is me bringing that up me calling you fat just for pointing out that more cis males have gender affirming care than trans people, statistically? You were wrong to say I was calling you fat, because I wasn’t. But you can’t say “I was mistaken in thinking you called me fat.”

                  “It didn’t say anything about surgeries”

                  You might as well have been talking about pasta in general and then start crying when I bring up spaghetti, saying “I was talking about pasta, it has nothing to do with spaghetti!” One is a subcategory of the other. “Gender affirming care” includes within it gender affirming surgeries.

                  And how exactly would you go about getting a bigger dick without a surgery, pray tell?